Background: Thoracofemoral bypass has been applied mostly secondary to previous procedures in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. However, its application as an initial treatment is less common, and long-term outcomes remain uncertain. The aim of this analysis was to review the 16-year experience and long-term outcomes of 31 consecutive patients who underwent thoracofemoral bypass as the primary procedure.

Methods: All patients who underwent thoracofemoral bypass for severe aortoiliac occlusive disease between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The occlusion and calcified plaques of the abdominal aorta at the renal level were common characteristics of all patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups: severe claudication group (Rutherford III group) and chronic limb-threatening ischemia group (Rutherford IV-V). Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables between the groups, and t-test or Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare continuous variables according to their distributions. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to depict the time-to-event data.

Results: Thirty-one patients [age: 62 (56-67.5); male: 87%] underwent thoracofemoral bypass. Among the 31 patients, 21 (67.7%) belonged to the severe claudication group (Rutherford III), while 10 (32.3%) were in the chronic limb-threatening ischemia (Rutherford IV-V). Twenty-two patients (83.8%) remained asymptomatic after thoracofemoral bypass. The mean follow-up duration was 79 ± 32 months. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.2% (n = 1). Major complications were observed in 9.6% of patients (n = 3; respiratory: 6.4%, retroperitoneal hematoma: 3.2%). No significant difference was found between the claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia groups regarding major complications (3.2% vs. 6.4%, P = NS). Minor complications occurred in 41.9% of patients, including pleural effusion 9.6% (n = 3), acute kidney injury 9.6% (n = 3), gastrointestinal bleeding 3.2% (n = 1), paralytic ileus 6.4% (n = 2), and superficial skin infection 12.9% (n = 4). The rate of postoperative superficial skin infection was higher in the chronic limb-threatening ischemia group compared to the claudication group (4 [40%] vs. 0 [0%], P: 0.007). The univariable Cox regression analysis revealed that hypertension and diabetes mellitus were not related to primary patency of the thoracofemoral bypass graft. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated primary patency for the entire study was 96% ± 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.6-100), and the secondary patency was 96.3% ± 6% (95% CI: 89.4-100). The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated survival rate after thoracofemoral bypass was 93.4% ± 3 (95% CI: 91-100).

Conclusions: We demonstrated in this study that thoracofemoral bypass can yield good outcomes when preferred as the initial treatment in selected patients with juxtarenal total aortic occlusion. Despite being a complex surgical technique, thoracofemoral bypass has shown to have safe, acceptable mortality and morbidity rates, as well as excellent long-term follow-up results in selected patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.09.069DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thoracofemoral bypass
40
chronic limb-threatening
16
limb-threatening ischemia
16
initial treatment
12
underwent thoracofemoral
12
claudication group
12
group rutherford
12
patients
11
bypass
10
thoracofemoral
9

Similar Publications

Background: Thoracofemoral bypass has been applied mostly secondary to previous procedures in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. However, its application as an initial treatment is less common, and long-term outcomes remain uncertain. The aim of this analysis was to review the 16-year experience and long-term outcomes of 31 consecutive patients who underwent thoracofemoral bypass as the primary procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Symptomatic Diaphragmatic Hernia after Thoracofemoral Bypass.

Ann Vasc Surg

October 2021

Department of Surgery, Divisions of Vascular, VA Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts. Electronic address:

Despite its relative underutilization in the primary management of aortoiliac occlusive disease, thoracofemoral bypass is an attractive extra-anatomic surgical option in select patients. Thoracofemoral bypass classically entails passing a graft from the left chest into the retroperitoneal space through a small opening created in the diaphragm. While theoretically possible that this maneuver may predispose to a peri-graft diaphragmatic hernia, currently there are no cases of this complication reported in the literature, nor has its surgical repair been described.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Thoracofemoral bypass outcomes in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

J Vasc Surg

June 2021

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala. Electronic address:

Objective: Thoracofemoral bypass (TFB) has been used infrequently but is an alternative for select patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. Limited data are available in the reported data regarding TFB, with all studies small, single-center series. We aimed to describe the perioperative and long-term survival, patency, and rate of major perioperative complications after TFB in a large national registry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Contemporary outcomes of thoracofemoral bypass.

J Vasc Surg

April 2019

Division of Vascular Surgery & Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.

Objective: Thoracofemoral bypass (TFB) is an alternative to aortofemoral bypass (AFB) or extra-anatomic bypass for severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). TFB may be particularly useful in select patients with concurrent visceral aortic branch vessel disease, infrarenal aortic occlusions, or after failed AFB. However, there are few contemporary series describing the indications and outcomes for TFB.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • In patients who can tolerate the stress of clamping the descending thoracic aorta, thoracofemoral bypass could offer better durability and blood flow compared to axillobifemoral bypass.
  • This procedure can be done using less invasive methods, such as thoracoscopic techniques and robotic assistance to connect the blood vessels (anastomosis).
  • Overall, these advancements in technique aim to improve patient outcomes by reducing invasiveness and enhancing perfusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!