Objective: To analyze in-hospital results after «Cox-maze III» and «Cox-maze IV» procedures with concomitant mitral valve surgery.

Material And Methods: This study included patients who underwent «Cox-maze III» and «Cox-maze IV» procedures between January 2015 and February 2022. We distinguished 2 groups using propensity score matching: «Cox-maze III» group (=15), «Cox-maze IV» group (=14). All patients had preoperative atrial fibrillation: paroxysmal (3 (10.3%) patients), persistent (5 (17.2%)) and long-standing persistent (21 (72.4%) patients). Mean duration of AF before surgery was 11 [9-60] months in both groups. We used standard statistical methods using the IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 software package (USA).

Results: Aortic cross-clamping time was significantly less in the «Cox-maze IV» group (<0.001). There was no in-hospital mortality in both groups. Mean duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly less in the «Cox-maze IV» group (5 [3.5-9] vs. 14 [12-18] hours, respectively, <0.001). Drainage output in the first postoperative day was significantly less in the «Cox-maze IV» group (295 [220-370] vs. 400 [325-500] ml, respectively, =0.02). Temporary pacemaker was required in 73.3% and 42.8% of cases, respectively (=0.03).

Conclusion: We should emphasize high efficiency of sinus rhythm recovery after both procedures without significant difference (=0.16). However, time of aortic cross-clamping, mechanical ventilation and volume of postoperative bleeding were significantly less in the «Cox-maze IV» group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202310114DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

«cox-maze iv»
16
«cox-maze iii»
12
atrial fibrillation
8
concomitant mitral
8
mitral valve
8
iii» «cox-maze
8
iv» procedures
8
iv» group
8
«cox-maze
7
patients
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!