AI Article Synopsis

  • This study looked at how well a new mixed reality (MiR) technique works for a medical procedure compared to the usual method.
  • The researchers tested this on a model by doing a total of 60 needle punctures: 30 using MiR and 30 with the conventional method.
  • Results showed that both methods had good success rates, but the MiR technique’s angles of entry were slightly different compared to the conventional method.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility and usability of a mixed reality (MiR)-assisted common femoral arterial (CFA) access technique using a sonography-assisted registration method.

Materials And Methods: A total of 60 CFA punctures were performed on a phantom model by 2 observers. Thirty punctures were performed using MiR (MiR group) and 30 punctures were performed using a conventional sonography-guided access procedure (control group). In the MiR group, a virtual object was created based on a computed tomography (CT) angiography scan of the model and registered to the physical patient in an MiR environment utilizing a software prototype that allowed registration based on a sonography scan. Positional error assessment encompassed 4 measurements using cone beam CT scans: (1) distance of the needle tip to the centerline, (2) distance of the needle entry site from the mid-level of the ostium of the profound femoral artery, (3) angle of entry of the needle in coronal, and (4) sagittal planes. Technical success rates as well as positional errors were compared between both groups. In addition, the usability of the system was assessed according to the system usability scale (SUS).

Results: Technical success was 96.7% and 100% in the MiR and control groups, respectively. The median distance between the needle tip and the centerline was 3.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.0-4.6) in the MiR group and 3.2 mm (IQR: 2.3-3.9) (p=0.63) in the control group. Similarly, the median distance from the needle entry site to the mid-level of the ostium of the profound femoral artery was 3.0 mm (IQR: 2.0-5.0) in the MiR group and 4.5 mm (IQR: 2.0-7.8) (p=0.18) in the control group. The median coronal angles of needle entry were 7.5° (IQR: 6-11) and 6° (IQR: 2-12) (p=0.13), and the median sagittal angles were 50° (IQR: 47-51) and 51° (IQR: 50-55) (p<0.01) in the MiR and control groups, respectively. The mean SUS score provided by both observers was 51.3.

Conclusion: The feasibility of an MiR-assisted CFA access technique could be demonstrated on a phantom model. Further studies are needed to investigate the technique beyond phantom model experiments and in different anatomical settings.

Clinical Impact: This study demonstrates the technical feasibility of a Mixed-Reality-assisted common femoral arterial access procedure on a phantom model. The positional accuracy was comparable to a conventional sonography-guided technique. However, there are several limitations that need to be resolved prior to potential implementation into clinical practice. Further studies are needed to investigate its performance beyond phantom model experiments and the prototypical application requires further technical refinement to increase its usability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15266028231208640DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mir group
16
distance needle
16
punctures performed
12
control group
12
needle entry
12
common femoral
8
femoral arterial
8
phantom model
8
needle centerline
8
entry site
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!