Aim: Rectal prolapse is a common and significantly debilitating condition. Surgical correction is usually required. The two most common abdominal approaches are ventral mesh rectopexy and posterior suture rectopexy. Both may be complicated, respectively, by either mesh-related complications or significant postoperative constipation. We report the outcome of a novel rectopexy operation which combines aspects of both the aforementioned approaches, for the treatment of external rectal prolapse (ERP).

Method: The technique involves laparoscopic partial posterior-lateral rectal mobilization of the rectum with posterior suture fixation to the sacral promontory and placement of an absorbable mesh in the rectovaginal space. Data were collected on postoperative complications, prolapse recurrence, mesh-related complications and the assessment of quality of life.

Results: Eighty patients underwent a modified mesh rectopexy for ERP. Seventy-seven were women. The median age was 67.5 years. Almost a third had undergone a previous rectal prolapse repair. Recurrences were seen in 11 (13.8%). No mesh-related complications were seen. Eleven patients reported postoperative constipation.

Conclusion: The laparoscopic modified mesh rectopexy may be a safe and effective operation for the treatment of ERP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.16804DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mesh rectopexy
16
rectal prolapse
16
modified mesh
12
mesh-related complications
12
laparoscopic modified
8
external rectal
8
posterior suture
8
rectopexy
6
mesh
5
rectal
5

Similar Publications

The Learning Curve in Urogynecology and Functional Urology: A Systematic Review.

Int Urogynecol J

January 2025

Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Attar-E-Neishabouri Sqr., Tabriz, 51666, Iran.

Introduction And Hypothesis: When adopting new methods, surgeons may experience a period of complexity and longer operation times because of their inexperience. This period is known as the "learning curve." This study was aimed at systematically reviewing the current literature on functional urology learning curves.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is an established surgical treatment for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. In contrast to continental Europe, in the UK and US the use of synthetic mesh has been abandoned in favour of biologic mesh, due to concerns regarding mesh related morbidity. The current study investigated if either material is superior, in terms of clinical recurrence and mesh related complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Laparoscopic procedure for rectal prolapse has extend throughout the world as a minimally invasive treatment. Various techniques have been reported regarding the use of mesh, fixation, and rectal mobilization. However, a standard technique has not been established yet.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse in male patients.

Tech Coloproctol

November 2024

Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Rectal prolapse surgery outcomes were reviewed in predominantly male populations, examining factors like recurrence, complications, and bowel function.
  • Eight studies involving 452 male patients showed that abdominal procedures had lower recurrence rates (6%) compared to perineal procedures (19.3%), but longer operative times.
  • The best results for improving constipation and fecal incontinence were found after resection rectopexy and posterior mesh rectopexy, respectively.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!