Comparison of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilators.

Background: The performance of high-frequency oscillatory ventilators (HFOV) differs by the waveform generation mode and circuit characteristics. Few studies have described the performance of piston-type HFOV. The present study aimed to compare the amplitude required to reach the target high-frequency tidal volume ([Formula: see text]); determine the relationship between the settings and actual pressure in amplitude or mean airway pressure ([Formula: see text]); and describe the interaction among compliance, frequency, and endotracheal tube (ETT) inner diameter in 4 HFOV models, including Humming X, Vue (a piston type ventilator commonly used in Japan), VN500 (a diaphragm type), and SLE5000 (a reverse jet type).

Methods: The oscillatory ventilators were evaluated by using a 50-mL test lung with 0.5 and 1.0 mL/cm HO compliance, [Formula: see text] of 10 cm HO, frequency of 12 and 15 Hz, and ETT inner diameters 2.0, 2.5, and 3.5 mm. At each permutation of compliance, frequency, and ETT, the target high-frequency [Formula: see text] was increased from 0.5 to 3.0 mL. The change in [Formula: see text] from the ventilator (ventilator [Formula: see text]) to Y-piece (Y [Formula: see text]) and alveolar pressure (alveolar [Formula: see text]) and the change in amplitude from the ventilator (ventilator amplitude) to Y-piece (Y amplitude) and alveolar pressure (alveolar amplitude) were determined at high-frequency [Formula: see text] of 1.0 and 3.0 mL.

Results: To achieve the target high-frequency [Formula: see text], the Humming X and Vue required a higher amplitude than did the SLE5000, but the maximum amplitude in the VN500 was unable to attain a larger high-frequency [Formula: see text]. Ventilator [Formula: see text] and alveolar pressure decreased at the Y-piece with the Humming X and Vue but increased with the SLE5000. The ventilator [Formula: see text] in the VN500 decreased remarkably at a frequency of 15 Hz. The ventilator amplitude in all 4 ventilators decreased while temporarily increasing at the Y-piece in the VN500.

Conclusions: The actual measured value, such as alveolar [Formula: see text] and high-frequency [Formula: see text], varied according to the type of HFOV system and the inner diameter of the ETT, even with identical settings. Clinicians should therefore determine the setting appropriate to each HFOV model.