A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation of Proprietary and Novel Step-counting Algorithms for Individuals Ambulating With a Lower Limb Prosthesis. | LitMetric

Validation of Proprietary and Novel Step-counting Algorithms for Individuals Ambulating With a Lower Limb Prosthesis.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

Max Näder Center for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Center for Bionic Medicine, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Chicago, IL; Northwestern University, Department of Physical Therapy & Human Movement Sciences, Chicago, IL. Electronic address:

Published: March 2024

Objective: To compare the accuracy and reliability of 10 different accelerometer-based step-counting algorithms for individuals with lower limb loss, accounting for different clinical characteristics and real-world activities.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: General community setting (ie, institutional research laboratory and community free-living).

Participants: Forty-eight individuals with a lower limb amputation (N=48) wore an ActiGraph (AG) wGT3x-BT accelerometer proximal to the foot of their prosthetic limb during labeled indoor/outdoor activities and community free-living.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), absolute and root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland Altman plots were used to compare true (manual) step counts to estimated step counts from the proprietary AG Default algorithm and low frequency extension filter, as well as from 8 novel algorithms based on continuous wavelet transforms, fast Fourier transforms (FFTs), and peak detection.

Results: All algorithms had excellent agreement with manual step counts (ICC>0.9). The AG Default and FFT algorithms had the highest overall error (RMSE=17.81 and 19.91 steps, respectively), widest limits of agreement, and highest error during outdoor and ramp ambulation. The AG Default algorithm also had among the highest error during indoor ambulation and stairs, while a FFT algorithm had the highest error during stationary tasks. Peak detection algorithms, especially those using pre-set parameters with a trial-specific component, had among the lowest error across all activities (RMSE=4.07-8.99 steps).

Conclusions: Because of its simplicity and accuracy across activities and clinical characteristics, we recommend the peak detection algorithm with set parameters to count steps using a prosthetic-worn AG among individuals with lower limb loss for clinical and research applications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2023.10.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lower limb
16
highest error
16
individuals lower
12
step counts
12
step-counting algorithms
8
algorithms individuals
8
limb loss
8
clinical characteristics
8
manual step
8
default algorithm
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!