A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prevalence of Chagas disease in Latin American pregnant women in Madrid, Spain: A multicentre cross-sectional study from 2011 to 2016. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection (Chagas disease) among pregnant migrants in Madrid, focusing on their countries of origin and the effectiveness of screening methods.
  • Conducted across eight hospitals between 2011 and 2016, it found that out of 149,470 deliveries, only 11,048 pregnant women were screened, with a significant majority being from Bolivia and a high prevalence of infection among those screened.
  • Results highlighted a 47% average screening coverage across hospitals, showing a stark contrast between those with universal screening (73% coverage) versus selective screening (10% coverage), providing essential insights for health policymakers.

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess Trypanosoma cruzi infection prevalence among pregnant migrants living in Madrid according to the country of origin and to assess screening coverage in this at-risk population.

Methods: Retrospective multicentre cross-sectional study conducted from January 2011 to December 2016 in eight Madrid hospitals. Each hospital reviewed their microbiology data records to assess the screening coverage and serological diagnosis in all pregnant women coming from endemic areas.

Results: From 2011 to 2016, 149,470 deliveries were attended at the eight hospitals, and 11,048 pregnant women were screened for Chagas disease. Most cases (93.5%) were in women from Bolivia, who also showed the highest prevalence (12.4%, 95% confidence interval: 9.9-15.0). Pooled prevalence amongst the screened women was 2.9% (95% CI: 1.8-4.1). Chagas disease screening coverage varied greatly between centres, with a pooled mean coverage of 47% (95% CI: 37%-57%; 73% [95% CI: 63%-82%] for those centres with universal screening vs. 10% [95% CI: 6%-15%] for those with a selective screening approach; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study provides useful data for policy makers and epidemiologists in a non-endemic area without congenital Chagas screening programmes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13942DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chagas disease
12
pregnant women
12
screening coverage
12
multicentre cross-sectional
8
cross-sectional study
8
2011 2016
8
assess screening
8
women
5
screening
5
prevalence
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!