Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a relatively common disease, especially in the elderly, for which there is no clear standard of treatment available. The authors systematically evaluated the efficacy of various surgical procedures for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma.
Methods: Electronic databases of PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Medicine, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Based on the PRISMA template, we finally selected and analyzed 13 eligible papers to evaluate the effect of different drainage methods on CSDH. The primary outcomes were recurrence and clinical outcomes. Secondary outcomes were mortality and postoperative complications and other parameters.
Results: The meta-analysis included 3 randomized controlled trials and 10 retrospective studies (non-randomized controlled trials) involving 3619 patients. The pooled results showed no statistically significant difference between non-subdural drainage (NSD) and subdural drainage (SD) in mortality and complication rates (P > 0.05). Additionally, overall pooled results showed that the use of NSD (10.9%) has a lower recurrence rate than the use of SD (11.7%), but the results were not statistically significant (relative risk ratio [RR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-1.45; I2 = 47%; P = .92). However, the difference between NSD and SD in postoperative bleeding rate reached statistical significance (RR = 2.39; 95% CI = 1.31-4.36; I2 = 0 %; P = .004). Subgroup analysis showed that SD was associated with similar recurrent CSDH (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.52-1.09; I2 = 0%; P = .14), good recovery (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.93-1.04; I2 = 0%; P = .50), and mortality (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.37-2.57; I2 = 0%; P = .96), compared to NSD.
Conclusions: These results suggest that NSD and SD are equally effective in the treatment of patients with CSDH, with no difference in final clinical characteristics and radiologic outcomes. However, in patients with limited subdural space after evacuation of a hematoma, NSD may be the preferred strategy to avoid iatrogenic brain injury.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10615464 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035731 | DOI Listing |
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg
December 2024
Division of Neurosurgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common pathology in daily practice of neurosurgery. Surgical management usually offers a significant clinical recovery. However, the recurrence rate is still high.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld Neurosurg
December 2024
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México; Instituto de Neurología y Neurocirugía Centro Médico Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México. Electronic address:
World Neurosurg
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, The Jinyang Hospital Affiliated to Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China. Electronic address:
World Neurosurg
December 2024
Department of General Surgery, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Sindh Government Lyari General Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. Electronic address:
Langenbecks Arch Surg
December 2024
Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Lyari Hospital Rd, Rangiwara Karachi, Karachi City, Sindh, 75010, Pakistan.
To the Editor,I would like to acknowledge the valuable efforts taken to enhance the knowledge through the article "Prediction model for poor short-term prognosis in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) after burr hole drainage: a retrospective cohort study" [1]. We thoroughly read this article published in your journal and learned the aim behind this study. This article has described every aspect of determining prognosis postoperatively in patients after evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma via a single burr hole.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!