Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Water content of surface fuels is an important indicator of forest fire risk level and fire behavior, and the prediction model of which has a significant effect on fire risk prediction and management. Based on field meteorological factors of and var. forests and water content data of dead fuels on the ground, we conducted the relative importance ranking of meteorological factors random forest and Pearson correlation analysis, and predicted water content of fuels using deeply learned convolutional neural network and meteorological factors regression. The results showed that water content of fuels in the wild was significantly higher than that of var. . The results of random forest showed that the factors that had significant effect on water content of fuel were humidity, temperature, rainfall, wind speed, and solar radiation, with the importance ranking from the largest to the smallest. Results of correlation analysis showed that temperature, humidity, and rainfall of current day had a significant impact on water content of fuels, and certain correlations were observed between meteorological factors. The prediction of the convolutional neural network model for the surface fuel water content of and var. forest was 0.928 and 0.905, the mean absolute error (MAE) was 6.1% and 8.1%, and the mean relative error (MRE) was 8.9% and 4.2%, respectively. However, the , MAE, MRE of meteorological factors regression were 0.495 and 0.525, 30.5% and 39.5%, 52.1% and 32.6%, respectively. The precision of convolution neural network model was significantly higher than that of meteorological factors regression. Our results showed that the deeply learned convolutional neural network could provide some reference for the prediction of fuel water content in the future, and effectively support higher level forest fire management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202309.024 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!