Outcomes of in-office versus operating room insertion of tympanostomy tubes in children.

Objective: Tympanostomy tube insertion in children is commonly performed under general anesthesia, but there has been increasing interest in office-based alternatives. Although initial research comparing in-office versus operating room (OR) insertion of tubes looks promising, there are scant data available on long-term outcomes. The objective of this study is to compare long-term outcomes of tympanostomy tubes placed in-office versus the OR, with emphasis on the duration of tube function.

Methods: We reviewed electronic medical records in an academic pediatric otolaryngology practice of children under age 13 years who had tubes placed in-office or the OR between 2010 and 2021. Differences in time to unilateral and bilateral tube occlusion/extrusion were compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log rank comparison. Cox regression modeling was performed to identify predictors of tube occlusion/extrusion.

Results: 817 children were included (473 office tubes, 344 OR tubes). Tube placement was equally successful for both groups (98.3% for office and 98.9% for OR). Comparison of Kaplan-Meier plots for time to unilateral and bilateral tube occlusion/extrusion by location showed no significant difference (P = .842 for unilateral and P = .714 for bilateral). However, regression analysis indicated a strong interaction of location with operator status (resident vs attending). Median time to unilateral occlusion/extrusion and bilateral occlusion/extrusion was shorter for OR residents compared to OR attendings (15.0 vs 19.5 months, P = .002, and 22.1 vs 32.0 months, P = .030, respectively). There was no difference in the time to unilateral or bilateral tube occlusion/extrusion between the office attending and OR attending groups (16.8 vs 19.5 months, P = .057 for unilateral, and 23.0 vs 32.0 months, P = .320 for bilateral). There was no significant difference between groups in the need for tube removal, repeat tubes, tube medialization, or post-extrusion tympanic membrane perforation.

Conclusion: The comparable long-term outcomes found for tubes inserted in-office versus the OR, including time to occlusion/extrusion, suggest that both settings are acceptable for the procedure, with choice based primarily on parental preference, clinician experience, and shared decision making with families.