Background: The health sector aims to improve health outcomes and access to healthcare. At the same time, the sector relies on unsustainable environmental practices that are increasingly recognised to be catastrophic threats to human health and health inequities. As such, a moral imperative exists for the sector to address these practices. While strides are currently underway to mitigate the environmental impacts of healthcare, less is known about how health researchers are addressing these issues, if at all.

Methods: This paper uses an interview methodology to explore the attitudes of UK health researchers using data-intensive methodologies about the adverse environmental impacts of their practices, and how they view the importance of these considerations within wider health goals.

Results: Interviews with 26 researchers showed that participants wanted to address the environmental and related health harms associated with their research and they reflected on how they could do so in alignment with their own research goals. However, when tensions emerged, their own research was prioritised. This was related to their own desires as researchers and driven by the broader socio-political context of their research endeavours.

Conclusion: To help mitigate the environmental and health harms associated with data-intensive health research, the socio-political context of research culture must be addressed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612270PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00973-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health
12
environmental impacts
12
health inequities
8
mitigate environmental
8
health researchers
8
environmental health
8
health harms
8
harms associated
8
socio-political context
8
environmental
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!