Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aerobic and hemodynamic performance, at rest and during exercise, has been explored in patients with either atrial synchronous ventricular or respiratory-dependent ventricular pacing. In patients with chronic AV block and normal left ventricle, the cardiac output, VO2 at maximal exercise, and work tolerance increased significantly with rate-responsive pacing in comparison with fixed ventricular pacing. Chronic AV block and left ventricle dysfunction in patients with respiratory-dependent ventricular pacing improved maximal cardiac output, VO2 anaerobic threshold, and physical work capacity. The benefit of rate-responsive pacing was found to be significantly greater in patients with left ventricle dysfunction than in patients with normal left ventricle function.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000413044 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!