AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was done to compare two different ways of treating back fractures caused by weak bones (osteoporosis) using a procedure called balloon kyphoplasty.
  • 80 patients with fresh fractures were split into two groups: one used the new method called the extrapedicular approach, and the other used the traditional transpedicular approach.
  • After one month, the patients using the extrapedicular approach reported less pain, and both methods were equally safe, meaning no major differences in how well they worked or led to complications.

Article Abstract

Background: The unilaterally extrapedicular approach is adopted increasingly to perform balloon kyphoplasty in treating osteoporotic lumbar fractures, which is intended to improve radiological and clinical efficacy. We compared the efficacy and safety of this method with a unilaterally transpedicular approach.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolling participants with a one-level osteoporotic lumbar fracture in less than 1 month. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo kyphoplasty via either a unilaterally extrapedicular approach (treatment group) or a unilaterally transpedicular approach (control group). The primary outcome was the difference in change from baseline to 1 month in visual analog scale (VAS) scores between the two groups. Secondary outcome measures included vertebral height ratio, operation time, fluoroscopic times, hemoglobin loss, and cement leakage between groups. Data were analyzed by intention to treat principle.

Results: A total of 80 participants were assigned to the treatment group (n = 40) and control group (n = 40), with three and two patients lost to follow-up during 12 months in the two groups, respectively. At 1 month postoperatively, the treatment group showed a greater reduction in VAS score from baseline, compared with the control group (mean difference between groups = 0.63, 95%CI 0.19-1.06). There were no significant between-group differences in restoration in anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body (P > 0.05). No significant differences were found in the rate of cement leakage and perioperative hemoglobin loss (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with balloon kyphoplasty via the unilaterally transpedicular approach in treating lumbar OVCFs, the unilaterally extrapedicular approach appears to be promising in achieving effective pain relief, adequate cement infusion, short operation time, less fluoroscopy exposure, and comparable risk of cement leakage and vessel injury. It is an alternative approach for lumbar OVCFs treated with kyphoplasty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10604808PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04267-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unilaterally extrapedicular
16
osteoporotic lumbar
12
extrapedicular approach
12
unilaterally transpedicular
12
treatment group
12
control group
12
cement leakage
12
kyphoplasty treating
8
treating osteoporotic
8
lumbar fractures
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!