AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the performance of the i-gel Plus and standard i-gel for fiberoptic tracheal intubation (FOI) in Thiel-embalmed cadavers, with 22 anesthesiologists participating as operators.
  • Results showed that the i-gel Plus allowed for a significantly shorter time to achieve FOI (30.3 seconds) compared to the standard i-gel (54.7 seconds).
  • Additionally, the i-gel Plus had a lower difficulty rating on the visual analog scale and required less upward angle of the fiberscope to visualize the vocal cords effectively.

Article Abstract

The supraglottic airway (SGA) is widely used. I-gel Plus is a next-generation i-gel with some improvements, including facilitation of fiberoptic tracheal intubation (FOI). To compare the performance of i-gel Plus and standard i-gel as conduits for FOI, a Thiel-embalmed cadaveric study was conducted. Twenty-two anesthesiologists were enrolled as operators in Experiment 1. The i-gel Plus and standard i-gel were inserted into one cadaver, and the FOI was performed through each SGA. The primary outcome was time required for FOI. The secondary outcomes were the number of attempts and visual analog scale (VAS) score for difficulty in FOI. Moreover, fiberoptic views of the vocal cords in each SGA were assessed by an attending anesthesiologist using nine cadavers in Experiment 2. The percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score without fiberscope tip upward flexion and upward angle of the fiberscope tip to obtain a 100% POGO score were evaluated as secondary outcomes. The time for FOI through i-gel Plus was significantly shorter than that through standard i-gel (median (IQR), i-gel Plus: 30.3 (25.4-39.0) s, vs standard i-gel: 54.7 (29.6-135.0) s; median of differences, 24.4 s; adjusted 95% confidence interval, 3.0-105.7; adjusted P = 0.040). Although the number of attempts for successful FOI was not significantly different, the VAS score for difficulty in the i-gel Plus group was significantly lower (easier) than that in the standard i-gel group. Moreover, i-gel Plus required a significantly smaller upward angle of the fiberscope tip to obtain a 100% POGO score. FOI can be performed more easily using i-gel Plus than using standard i-gel because of the improved fiberoptic visibility of vocal cords.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10603072PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45631-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

standard i-gel
28
i-gel
17
i-gel standard
12
pogo score
12
foi
8
foi performed
8
secondary outcomes
8
number attempts
8
vas score
8
score difficulty
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!