AI Article Synopsis

  • Researchers examined how the arrangement of layers in a multilayer network (MLN) affects readability and analysis tasks.
  • They conducted a study using a Virtual Reality headset to test 2D, 2.5D, and 3D arrangements across six different analysis tasks.
  • While there wasn't a definitive best arrangement, the study provided data-driven recommendations for effectively using each arrangement type based on specific analysis tasks.

Article Abstract

Relational information between different types of entities is often modelled by a multilayer network (MLN) - a network with subnetworks represented by layers. The layers of an MLN can be arranged in different ways in a visual representation, however, the impact of the arrangement on the readability of the network is an open question. Therefore, we studied this impact for several commonly occurring tasks related to MLN analysis. Additionally, layer arrangements with a dimensionality beyond 2D, which are common in this scenario, motivate the use of stereoscopic displays. We ran a human subject study utilising a Virtual Reality headset to evaluate 2D, 2.5D, and 3D layer arrangements. The study employs six analysis tasks that cover the spectrum of an MLN task taxonomy, from path finding and pattern identification to comparisons between and across layers. We found no clear overall winner. However, we explore the task-to-arrangement space and derive empirical-based recommendations on the effective use of 2D, 2.5D, and 3D layer arrangements for MLNs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327402DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

layer arrangements
12
multilayer network
8
virtual reality
8
25d layer
8
25d 3d?
4
3d? exploratory
4
exploratory study
4
study multilayer
4
network
4
network visualisations
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!