Image-guided surgical planning of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with patient-specific CTRs.

Purpose: We propose the utilization of patient-specific concentric-tube robots (CTRs) whose designs are optimized to enhance their volumetric reachability of the renal stone, thus reducing the morbidities associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. By employing a nested optimization-driven scheme, this work aims to determine a single surgical tract through which the patient-tailored CTR is deployed. We carry out a sensitivity analysis on the combined percutaneous access and optimized CTR design with respect to breathing-induced excursion of the kidneys based on preoperative images. Further, an investigation is also performed of the appropriateness and effectiveness of the percutaneous access provided by the proposed algorithm compared to that of an expert urologist.

Methods: The method is based on an ellipsoidal approximation to the renal calculi and a grid search over candidate skin areas and available renal calyces using an anatomically constrained kinematic mapping of the CTR. Percutaneous access is selected for collision-free CTR deployment to the centroid of the stones with minimal positional error at the renal calyx. Further optimization of the CTR design results in a robot tailored to the therapeutic anatomical features of each clinical case. The study examined 14 sets of clinical data of PCNL patients, analyzing stone reachability using preoperative images and breathing-induced motions of the kidney. An experienced urologist qualitatively assessed the adequacy of percutaneous access generated by the algorithm.

Results: An assessment conducted by an expert urologist found that the percutaneous accesses produced by the proposed approach were found to be comparable to those chosen by the expert surgeon in most clinical cases. The simulated results demonstrated a mean volume coverage of for static anatomy and and when considering a 1 cm excursion of the kidney in the craniocaudal directions due to respiration or tool-tissue interaction.

Conclusion: The optimization-driven scheme for determining a single tract surgical plan, coupled with the use of a patient-specific CTR, shows promising results for improving percutaneous access in PCNL procedures. This approach clearly shows the potential for enhancing the quality and suitability of percutaneous accesses, addressing the challenges posed by staghorn and non-staghorn stones during PCNL procedures. Further research involving clinical validation is necessary to confirm these findings and explore the potential clinical benefits of the approach.