A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Utilisation and optimisation of beta-adrenergic receptor blockers over a 6-month period among chronic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. | LitMetric

Background: Beta-adrenergic receptor blocker (BARB) drugs are a wide range of medicines that are used in various conditions, including chronic heart failure (HF). Several studies have reported a wide-ranging inappropriate use of evidence-based beta-blockers (EBBBs) in chronic HF in both inpatients and outpatients.

Objectives: To assess the utilisation and optimisation of EBBBs among patients with HF who presented with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods: A hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out at the Adult University Teaching Hospital (AUTH), in Lusaka, Zambia, where patient medical files for the period of 1 July 2018 to 31 July 2021 were reviewed. Patient information, including file number, age, sex, type of BARB and the dose used, was recorded on the developed and validated checklist. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with utilisation of BARBs.

Results: Of the 173 medical records reviewed, BARBs were utilised in 101 (58.4%) patients. Among the patients who utilised BARBs, 96 (95.0%) were taking EBBBs, while the rest (n=5, 5.0 %) were taking atenolol, which is a non-EBBB. Among the patients who were on EBBBs, none of them received the optimal dose. Age ≥65 years (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 - 0.64), previous hospitalisation (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.13 - 0.51) and furosemide dose ≥40 mg (aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.21 - 0.64) were significantly associated with lower likelihood of BARB utilisation. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II (aOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.08 - 10.7), NYHA class III (aOR 4.8, 95% CI 1.65 - 13.7) and patients using at least 5 medications (aOR 5.0, 95% CI 2.91 - 8.77) were independent predictors of BARB utilisation.

Conclusion: This study showed that 95.0% of chronic HF patients were utilising EBBBs, and none received the optimal dose as recommended in the guidelines. Pharmacotherapy with EBBBs should be optimised among patients with chronic HfrEF, as these drugs reduce both morbidity and mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i9.784DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aor 95%
24
utilisation optimisation
8
beta-adrenergic receptor
8
chronic heart
8
heart failure
8
patients
8
reduced ejection
8
ejection fraction
8
ebbbs received
8
received optimal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!