Objective: The study clarified differences in understanding and satisfaction between face-to-face and online training on radiation emergency medical preparedness (REMP) training.

Methods: The training was held at Hirosaki University between 2018 and 2022, with 46 face-to-face participants and 25 online participants.

Results: Face-to-face training was significantly more understandable than online for the use of the Geiger counter ( < 0.05), but the educational effect of virtual reality (VR) was not significantly different from the actual practice. For the team exercise of taking care of the victims, online resulted in a significantly higher understanding ( < 0.05).

Conclusions: Interactive exercises can be done online with equipment sent to learners, and VR is also as effective. The use of videos was more effective for first-timers to learn the practical process from a bird's-eye view, especially for team-based medical procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2023.188DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiation emergency
8
emergency medical
8
medical preparedness
8
online
6
online simulations
4
simulations radiation
4
preparedness effective
4
effective teaching
4
face-to-face
4
teaching face-to-face
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!