AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to improve the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for functional longevity (FL) by implementing a combined single-step (CSS) evaluation that incorporates information from five correlated traits.
  • Results showed that the CSS evaluation, even without direct FL data, provided significant indirect insights into FL through the correlation with other traits, leading to better identification of cow herd longevity based on GEBV.
  • The findings indicated that using CSS evaluations can effectively differentiate between groups of heifers regarding their future survival and productivity based on their genomic data.

Article Abstract

Background: For years, multiple trait genetic evaluations have been used to increase the accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBV) using information from correlated traits. In France, accurate approximations of multiple trait evaluations were implemented for traits that are described by different models by combining the results of univariate best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) evaluations. Functional longevity (FL) is the trait that has most benefited from this approach. Currently, with many single-step (SS) evaluations, only univariate FL evaluations can be run. The aim of this study was to implement a "combined" SS (CSS) evaluation that extends the "combined" BLUP evaluation to obtain more accurate genomic (G) EBV for FL when information from five correlated traits (somatic cell score, clinical mastitis, conception rate for heifers and cows, and udder depth) is added.

Results: GEBV obtained from univariate SS (USS) evaluations and from a CSS evaluation were compared. The correlations between these GEBV showed the benefits of including information from correlated traits. Indeed, a CSS evaluation run without any performances on FL showed that the indirect information from correlated traits to evaluate FL was substantial. USS and CSS evaluations that mimic SS evaluations with data available in 2016 were compared. For each evaluation separately, the GEBV were sorted and then split into 10 consecutive groups (deciles). Survival curves were calculated for each group, based on the observed productive life of these cows as known in 2021. Regardless of their genotyping status, the worst group of heifers based on their GEBV in 2016 was well identified in the CSS evaluation and they had a substantially shorter herd life, while those in the best heifer group had a longer herd life. The gaps between groups were more important for the genotyped than the ungenotyped heifers, which indicates better prediction of future survival.

Conclusions: A CSS evaluation is an efficient tool to improve FL. It allows a proper combination of information on functional traits that influence culling. In contrast, because of the strong selection intensity on young bulls for functional traits, the benefit of such a "combined" evaluation of functional traits is more modest for these males.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601146PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00839-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

correlated traits
20
css evaluation
20
functional traits
12
evaluation
9
traits
9
evaluation functional
8
functional longevity
8
including correlated
8
multiple trait
8
evaluations
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!