Background: Various preventive measures and treatment methods exist to prevent paraplegia during thoracic aortic surgery. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) is one of the treatment options when paraplegia occurs. This study aimed to evaluate the neurological efficacy of postoperative CSFD in patients undergoing thoracic aortic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery.

Methods: We analyzed perioperative data from 85 patients who underwent perioperative CSFD for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery between January 2006 and December 2022, focusing on neurological changes. A total of 61 patients (72%) received preoperative CSFD, and 24 patients (28%) received postoperative CSFD. Perioperative neurological data were analyzed with a focus on perioperative changes.

Results: In the postoperative CSFD group, the manual muscle test (MMT) score before CSFD was 0.8, that just after CSFD was 2.4, and that at discharge was 3.0. Therefore, postoperative CSFD improved MMT scores compared with preoperative CSFD. The mean time between surgery completion and postoperative CSFD implantation was 9.8 hours. However, 6 (25%) of the patients who developed postoperative paraplegia and underwent early postoperative CSFD remained paraplegic without any improvement. In the preoperative CSFD group, there was only one case (2%) of postoperative paraplegia.

Conclusions: Postoperative CSFD improved the neurological prognosis of individuals undergoing thoracic aortic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. However, 25% of the patients remained paraplegic despite postoperative CSFD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10586974PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-631DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

postoperative csfd
32
thoracic aortic
16
thoracoabdominal aortic
16
aortic surgery
16
csfd
15
aortic thoracoabdominal
12
preoperative csfd
12
postoperative
11
postoperative cerebrospinal
8
cerebrospinal fluid
8

Similar Publications

A dedicated preventive protocol sustainably avoids spinal cord ischemia after endovascular aortic repair.

Front Cardiovasc Med

August 2024

Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

Objective: To analyze the incidence of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) after the introduction of a dedicated SCI preventive protocol.

Methods: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing complex EVAR with branched (BEVAR) and/or fenestrated grafts (FEVAR) during a 6-year period starting January 1st, 2015. The preventive protocol consisted of staging extensive aortic repairs, maintaining a mean arterial pressure (MAP) >80 mm Hg, Hb level >110 g/L, early lower limb reperfusion and neurological control per hour during the post-operative stay in the intensive care unit (36-72 h).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to analyze hospital and intensive care unit stays in patients undergoing a specific vascular repair procedure for aortic aneurysms, focusing on the impact of different cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) strategies.
  • A review of 412 patients treated between 2008 and 2023 was conducted, comparing those who received prophylactic CSFD before 2020 to those who received therapeutic CSFD after 2020.
  • Results indicated a significant reduction in hospital stay duration with therapeutic drainage while maintaining similar rates of major complications and mortality between the two groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) in patients with chronic post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysm (PD-TAAA) over eight years, focusing on early and long-term outcomes.
  • A total of 55 patients (mostly men, averaging 63.7 years) were analyzed, revealing a 30-day mortality rate of 7% and a major adverse event (MAE) rate of 20%, with spinal cord injury complications seen in over 10% of cases.
  • The results showed a high technical success rate of 96%, with 86% survival at 24 months and improved outcomes for F-EVAR compared to B-E
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study explored complications related to cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) in patients undergoing fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR), focusing on its role in preventing spinal cord injury.
  • A systematic review was conducted using multiple databases, including MEDLINE, to analyze post-2000 literature on F/B-EVAR and CSFD complications, applying methods to ensure accurate data and quality assessment.
  • Findings revealed a CSFD-related mortality rate of 1.4% and an overall morbidity rate of 25.6%, with specific severe complications like intracranial hemorrhage and neurological deficits observed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) experience a poor prognosis and rapid progression, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) is used to manage intracranial hypertension and hydrocephalus in LMC patients. This study aims to describe a novel discovery of preoperative radiological features in patients who underwent CSFD for LMC.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted during the past 5 years of LMC patients with intracranial hypertension and hydrocephalus who underwent CSFD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!