Objectives: This article estimates the cost-effectiveness of adding pertuzumab to the combination of trastuzumab and docetaxel within the first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer with the amplification of HER2+.

Methods: Data from Czech clinical practice recorded in the BREAST register are used. A semi-Markov model with states derived based on the treatment phases (first-line medication, no medication, next-line medication, death) is defined to estimate costs from the healthcare payers' perspective. The benefits are estimated as patient survival until death. The Kaplan-Meier estimates are supplemented by the Cox proportional hazard and the accelerated failure time models to control for patient characteristics. Health-related quality-of-life indicators are derived from relevant literature.

Results: Based on the used data, adding pertuzumab does not result in statistically significantly longer survival while inducing higher treatment costs (€163 360 compared with €90 112 per patient in 2018 prices). Statistically longer survival was not supported by the log-rank test (P = .97), the Cox proportional hazard model, or the accelerated failure time model using the Gompertz distribution. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (€87 200) substantially exceeds the willingness to pay for 1 quality-adjusted life-year (€46 500).

Conclusions: This analysis indicates that adding pertuzumab cannot be considered cost-effective in Czechia. However, the observed phenomenon may be attributed to the limited duration of patient follow-up periods at the time of the study's execution (mean of 20-21 months). Importantly, we find that using states connected to specific treatment phases is appropriate for a retrospective analysis of patient-level clinical data.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2023.08.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adding pertuzumab
12
treatment metastatic
8
breast cancer
8
semi-markov model
8
treatment phases
8
cox proportional
8
proportional hazard
8
accelerated failure
8
failure time
8
statistically longer
8

Similar Publications

Background: For patients who achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab (T) and pertuzumab (P), the benefit of adding P to T remains uncertain. We compared survival outcomes according to the type of adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy in patients with pCR after chemotherapy with TP.

Method: Patients who achieved pCR in both the breast and axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TP were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is gaining importance in breast cancer treatment as it helps downstage tumors and provides insights into therapy responses, impacting individual prognoses and treatment choices.
  • Common NST regimens include anthracyclines and taxanes, with specific recommendations for HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer patients to enhance outcomes.
  • Recent clinical trials are focusing on optimizing NST options, especially for high-risk breast cancer, with emerging strategies like immune checkpoint inhibitors showing potential benefits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

JCO The APHINITY trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01358877) previously demonstrated that pertuzumab added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for patients with early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC). Here, we report the preplanned third interim analysis of overall survival (OS) and a descriptive updated iDFS analysis with 8.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The addition of pertuzumab (P) to trastuzumab (H) and standard chemotherapy (CT) as neoadjuvant treatment (NaT) for patients with HER2 + breast cancer (BC), has shown to increase the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, without main safety concerns. The aim of NeoPowER trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of P + H + CT in a real-world population.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of stage II-III, HER2 + BC patients treated with NaT: who received P + H + CT (neopower group) in 5 Emilia Romagna institutions were compared with an historical group who received H + CT (control group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Phase Ib dose-escalation trial of taselisib (GDC-0032) in combination with HER2-directed therapies in patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer.

ESMO Open

June 2024

Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston. Electronic address:

Background: In most patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, anti-HER2 therapies fail due to the development of acquired resistance, potentially mediated through phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling. We investigated adding taselisib, an α-selective potent oral inhibitor of PI3K, to different HER2-directed regimens in order to improve disease control.

Patients And Methods: Patients (n = 68) with advanced HER2+ breast cancer were enrolled to this open-label, dose-escalation phase Ib study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!