A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Impact of chiglitazar on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: A pooled data analysis from two phase III trials. | LitMetric

Background: To evaluate the glycemic control effects of vhiglitazar (carfloglitazar), a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor pan-agonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with metabolic syndrome (MetS) or insulin resistance (IR) using pooled data analysis of two phase III clinical trials.

Methods: Data were collected from two randomized phase III clinical trials in China, comparing chiglitazar to placebo or sitagliptin in T2DM patients. The MetS was defined by the Adult Treatment Panel III MetS criteria, and IR was defined by homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) ≥4.31 (male) or 4.51 (female). The main end point of this analysis was glycemic control in the different arms within each subgroup.

Results: In the MetS subgroup, changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline at week 24 in the chiglitazar 32 mg, chiglitazar 48 mg, and sitagliptin 100 mg arms were -1.44%, -1.68%, and -1.37%, respectively; p < .05 was obtained when chiglitazar 48 mg was compared with sitagliptin. In the IR subgroup, the changes in HbA1c were -1.58%, -1.56%, and -1.26% in chiglitazar 32 mg, chiglitazar 48 mg, and sitagliptin 100 mg arms, respectively; p < .05 was obtained when chiglitazar 32 mg was compared with sitaligptin. The two doses of chiglitazar demonstrated a greater reduction in fasting plasma glucose and 2 h postprandial plasma glucose than sitagliptin in the pooled population and in the MetS and IR subgroups.

Conclusions: Chiglitazar shows promising efficacy for glycemic control in patients with T2DM associated with MetS or IR. Further prospective trials are required to validate these findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10859313PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13484DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glycemic control
12
insulin resistance
12
phase iii
12
metabolic syndrome
8
resistance pooled
8
pooled data
8
data analysis
8
analysis phase
8
iii clinical
8
impact chiglitazar
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!