Background: Individuals with highly pronated feet (PF) are more prone to lower extremity injuries than those with mildly PF. However, whether foot kinematics and ground reaction force (GRF) characteristics differ according to the severity of PF deformity is unclear.
Research Question: Are there differences in foot kinematics and GRF characteristics during walking between individuals with mildly PF and those with highly PF?
Methods: Ten individuals with mildly PF and 10 with highly PF (six-item foot posture index scores: 6-9 and 10-12 points, respectively) participated in this study. A three-dimensional motion analysis system measured participants' foot kinematics and GRF characteristics during gait trials.
Results: Participants with highly PF exhibited significantly lower medial longitudinal arch heights than those with mildly PF from 0 % to 90 % of the stance phase (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in any of the angles between the foot segments. Additionally, participants with highly PF exhibited significantly larger posterior GRF than those with mildly PF from 2 % to 7 % of the stance phase (p < 0.05). Participants with highly PF also exhibited significantly larger anterior GRF than those with mildly PF, from 62 % to 82 % of the stance phase (p < 0.05).
Significance: The results of this study suggest that the more severe the PF deformity, the more inefficient the foot ground force transmission, and the stronger the load applied to the foot. These results may be related to the higher incidence of lower extremity injuries in individuals with highly PF than in those with mildly PF.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.10.011 | DOI Listing |
Sensors (Basel)
January 2025
Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City 14389, Mexico.
Portable monitoring devices based on Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have the potential to serve as quantitative assessments of human movement. This article proposes a new method to identify the optimal placements of the IMUs and quantify the smoothness of the gait. First, it identifies gait events: foot-strike (FS) and foot-off (FO).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSensors (Basel)
January 2025
German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Instrumented gait analysis is widely used in clinical settings for the early detection of neurological disorders, monitoring disease progression, and evaluating fall risk. However, the gold-standard marker-based 3D motion analysis is limited by high time and personnel demands. Advances in computer vision now enable markerless whole-body tracking with high accuracy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomedicines
December 2024
Department of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Patellofemoral pain (PFP) significantly affects patients' daily activities and consequently reduces their quality of life. Custom-made foot orthoses (FOs) are a common method of medical treatment that positively influences biomechanical factors such as the kinematics of the lower extremity and reduces pain perception in patients. However, there is a gap in research regarding the influence of different FO treatments on knee pain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe relevance of posture as a constituent of physical health varies depending on one's explanatory framework of disease. Contrasting perspectives within this discussion refer to optimal biomechanics, but often without consistent meaning. The resulting theoretical confusion presents challenges both for applied research and clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurol Int
January 2025
Laboratório de Marcha, Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação de Alcoitão, 2649-506 Alcabideche, Portugal.
Background/objectives: Post-stroke hemiparetic gait often presents with asymmetric patterns to compensate for stability deficits. This study examines gait differences in chronic stroke patients with spastic hemiparesis based on initial foot contact type-forefoot versus rearfoot.
Methods: Thirty-four independently walking spastic hemiparetic patients were retrospectively analyzed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!