Regarding reference state to identify priority areas for ecological restoration in a karst region.

J Environ Manage

Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

Published: December 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Widespread degradation of natural ecosystems has led to significant ecological issues, making ecological restoration a global priority for enhancing ecosystem services.
  • This study focuses on Guizhou Province in China, assessing ecosystem services under similar climate conditions and establishing an optimal ecosystem reference state for effective ecological restoration.
  • The approach resulted in identifying ecological restoration priority areas (EPRAs) and revealed a minimal increase in water conservation and habitat maintenance from 2001 to 2018, emphasizing the need for targeted restoration efforts.

Article Abstract

Widespread degradation of natural ecosystems around the globe has resulted in several ecological problems. Ecological restoration is considered a global priority as an important means of mitigating ecosystem degradation and enhancing ecosystem services provision. Regarding ecosystem reference state is a prerequisite for ecological restoration. However, there were few studies focusing on how to regard reference state for ecological restoration, especially under a changing climate. Taking Guizhou Province, a typical karst region in China, as a case study area, in this study we firstly assessed ecosystem services under homogeneous climate conditions. Secondly, we defined the optimal ecosystem services as ecosystem reference state, and then evaluated restoration suitability under a comprehensive framework. Finally, ecological restoration priority areas (EPRAs), which included ecological reconstruction areas, assisted regeneration areas and conservation priority areas needing restoration, were identified by integrating restoration suitability and conservation priority areas. The results showed that the services of water conservation and habitat maintenance only increased less than 10% from 2001 to 2018. Identified ecological reconstruction areas and assisted regeneration areas covered 1078 km and 1159 km respectively. Additionally, 15 conservation priority areas with the total area of 18,507 km were identified as conservation priority areas needing restoration. Accounting for 11.78% of the total area, ERPAs were mostly located in the eastern part of Guizhou, including Qiandongnan, Tongren, and Zunyi. The approach proposed here for regarding ecosystem reference state after controlling climate variables and the framework for identifying ERPAs can provide a scientific reference for large-scale ecological restoration planning.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119214DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

priority areas
24
ecological restoration
24
reference state
20
conservation priority
16
ecosystem services
12
ecosystem reference
12
areas
10
restoration
10
ecological
9
karst region
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!