We reply to Whitelam's Comment [Phys. Rev. E 108, 036105 (2023)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.108.036105] on our paper [Phys. Rev. E 100, 020103(R) (2019)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.100.020103] where we compute the exact large deviation (LD) statistics of a wide class of observables in the rule 54 cellular automaton. Using some heuristic arguments, Whitelam states that despite the fact that the LD functions we compute display singular behavior, this is not indicative of a LD phase transition or of dynamical phase coexistence. Here, we refute this observation and confirm that the (standard) interpretation of our exact results stands.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.036106 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
large deviation
8
deviation statistics
8
phase transition
8
[phys rev
8
reply "comment
4
"comment 'exact
4
'exact large
4
statistics trajectory
4
trajectory phase
4
transition deterministic
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!