Mexico's pandemic management and the absence of measures have been harshly criticized as being disproportionate. This paper examines whether the proportionality principle was properly applied to Mexico's COVID-19 response and outlines three reasons against such an endeavor, namely (i) the content of "proportionate measures" remained insufficiently well defined, (ii) there were yet fundamental rights conflicts to resolve, and (iii) the situation was moreover characterized by epistemic uncertainty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12429DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mexico's pandemic
8
pandemic management
8
proportionality mexico's
4
management covid-19
4
covid-19 crisis
4
crisis mexico's
4
management absence
4
absence measures
4
measures harshly
4
harshly criticized
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!