A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Bond strength between denture lining material and CAD-CAM denture base resin: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Statement Of Problem: An effective bond between a denture lining material and the denture base resin is necessary for proper function. Regarding the new technologies for manufacturing denture bases, a systematic search of the literature on this topic is lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the bond strength between denture lining material and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) denture base resin (milled and 3-dimensionally printed) versus conventional denture base resin.

Material And Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science) were independently searched by 4 researchers for relevant studies published up to April 2023. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) question was: "Comparing conventional and CAD-CAM (milled and 3-dimensionally printed) denture base materials, which promote greater bond strength when associated with denture lining material?" A meta-analysis was performed based on mean ±standard deviation bond strength values between denture base resins and denture lining material with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Five in vitro studies were included. For bond strength, no difference was noted between conventional and milled denture base resin (confidence interval: -0.99 [-2.17 to 0.20]; heterogeneity: t=0.57; Chi:4.57; I=78%; P=.10), and conventional resin had better values compared with those of 3-dimensionally (3D) printed (confidence interval: 3.03 [2.40-3.66]; heterogeneity: t=0.00; Chi:0.56; I=0%; P<.001) when relined with soft materials. The milled denture base resin was better than the conventional (confidence interval: -0.85 [-1.33 to -0.38]; heterogeneity: Chi:28.87; I=93%; P<.001), with no difference between 3D printed and conventional (confidence interval: 0.18 [-4.23 to 4.59]; heterogeneity: t=16.51; Chi:130.99; I=98%; P=.94) for hard liners.

Conclusions: The bond strength between resins for milled CAD-CAM denture bases and denture lining material was similar to that of conventional denture base resin, regardless of the consistency of the denture lining material. The bond strength to 3D printed CAD-CAM resin was lower than that of the milled version.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

denture base
28
bond strength
20
denture lining
20
lining material
16
base resin
16
denture
13
3-dimensionally printed
12
strength denture
8
cad-cam denture
8
systematic review
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!