Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Infections of Legionnaires' disease in the United States caused by Legionella have increased ninefold between the years 2000-2018. Legionella harbored in biofilms or inside amoeba within premise plumbing can be more resistant to disinfectants, thus causing treatment challenges. Ultraviolet-light emitting diodes (UV-LEDs) are an emerging water disinfection technology with several advantages over conventional UV lamps. In this study, we evaluated the effects of UV-LEDs (255, 265, and 285 nm), a low-pressure (LP) mercury UV lamp (254 nm), and a bandpass filtered medium-pressure (MP) mercury UV lamp (220 nm) on properties and inactivation of three strains of L. pneumophila serogroup 1. The UV-LEDs emitting at 255 and 265 nm showed greater inactivation performance against all the strains compared to the UV-LED at 285 nm and the LP UV lamp at 254 nm. Our results showed that strains of the same serogroup exhibited different UV sensitivities. Analyses of DNA and protein damage revealed that UV exposure using 254, 255, and 265 nm predominantly causes DNA damage, while protein damage is predominant at 220 nm. Both DNA and protein damage were observed at 285 nm, but the extent of DNA damage was relatively less significant compared to the other wavelengths. Electric energy consumption analysis showed that water treatment using UV-LEDs is currently unsatisfactory compared to conventional LP UV lamps due to the mediocre wall plug efficiency (WPE) of UV-LEDs. However, recent studies indicate that the WPE of UV-LEDs is continuously improving. Overall, our study highlights that UV-LEDs are a promising technology for inactivating waterborne pathogens and have the potential to replace existing UV mercury lamps for water disinfection applications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417679 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167781 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!