Introduction: The increasing popularity of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a bariatric procedure has been accompanied by concerns about potential complications, including staple line bleeding and leaks. Additionally, postoperative quality of life can be affected by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and food-related issues. In light of these factors, there is a need to compare the outcomes of standard LSG with LSG with omentopexy. This comparative analysis aims to provide insights into the distinct recovery processes associated with these two approaches.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of LSG in two groups: LSG alone and LSG with omentopexy. Data collected from January 2022 to April 2022 included patient characteristics, surgical details, complications, medication usage, and follow-up. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) scores were recorded at postoperative intervals of 15 days, one month, and three months.

Results: This study analyzed 29 patients who underwent standard LSG and 36 patients who underwent LSG combined with omentopexy. The two groups exhibited similarities in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, surgical duration, complications, hospitalization duration, and medication requirements (p > 0.005). Telephone consultations were significantly higher in the LSG with omentopexy group (p < 0.001). Nausea (p = 0.486) and vomiting (p = 0.603) rates did not significantly differ, but the constipation rate at one month was higher in LSG with omentopexy (p = 0.244). The flatulence rate at one month was significantly higher in LSG with omentopexy (p < 0.007). GIQLI scores were significantly lower in LSG with omentopexy at 15 days (p < 0.001) and one month (p < 0.001), but not at three months (p = 0.884).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that LSG and LSG with omentopexy have similar surgical outcomes and short-term complications. However, differences exist in postoperative symptoms and quality of life experiences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576198PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45201DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lsg omentopexy
28
quality life
16
lsg
12
lsg lsg
12
higher lsg
12
laparoscopic sleeve
8
sleeve gastrectomy
8
comparative analysis
8
surgical outcomes
8
compare outcomes
8

Similar Publications

Background: We aimed to compare the omentopexy and clipping reinforcement methods performed along the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in terms of the effectiveness on postoperative bleeding.

Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study, patients were divided into two groups: clips group (CG) and omentopexy group (OG). The groups were compared in terms of postoperative bleeding, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, hospital readmissions in the postoperative first 30-days.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Efficacy of Omentopexy on Complications of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Obes Surg

September 2024

General Surgery Department, Istinye University VM Medical Park Pendik Hospital, Fevzi Çakmak Mahallesi, D100, Cemal Gürsel Cd. No:9, Pendik, 34899, Istanbul, Turkey.

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a commonly performed type of bariatric surgery. Early complications of LSG include bleeding, leakage, pulmonary embolism, and surgical site infections. Most surgeons try to implement preventive methods, such as omentopexy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with omentopexy (O-LSG) has been compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with no-omentopexy (NO-LSG) in terms of postoperative outcomes and one-year anthropometric results. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare the utility of omentopexy in sleeve gastrectomy. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with omentopexy (LSGO) versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for obesity treatment. A systematic online search was conducted using the available online databases, and Revman software was used for data analysis. Twenty-two eligible comparative studies were included (n = 9,321).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The increasing popularity of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a bariatric procedure has been accompanied by concerns about potential complications, including staple line bleeding and leaks. Additionally, postoperative quality of life can be affected by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and food-related issues. In light of these factors, there is a need to compare the outcomes of standard LSG with LSG with omentopexy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!