The value of arterial spin labelling (ASL) perfusion MRI in the assessment of post-treatment progression in adult glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The distinction between viable tumor and therapy-induced changes is crucial for the clinical management of patients with gliomas. This study aims to quantitatively assess the efficacy of arterial spin labeling (ASL) biomarkers, including relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF), for the discrimination of progressive disease (PD) and treatment-related effects.

Methods: Eight articles were included in the synthesis after searching the literature systematically. Data have been extracted and a meta-analysis using the random-effect model was subsequently carried out. Diagnostic accuracy assessment was also performed.

Results: This study revealed that there is a significant difference in perfusion measurements between groups with PD and therapy-induced changes. The rCBF yielded a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.25 [95% CI 0.75, 1.75] ( < .00001). The maximum perfusion indices (rCBF and CBF) both showed equivalent discriminatory ability, with SMD of 1.35 [95% CI 0.78, 1.91] ( < .00001) and 1.56 [95% CI 0.79, 2.33] ( < .0001), respectively. Similarly, accuracy estimates were comparable among ASL-derived metrices. Pooled sensitivities [95% CI] were 0.85 [0.67, 0.94], 0.88 [0.71, 0.96], and 0.93 [0.73, 0.98], and pooled specificities [95% CI] were 0.83 [0.71, 0.91], 0.83 [0.67, 0.92], 0.84 [0.67, 0.93], for rCBF, rCBF and CBF, respectively. Corresponding HSROC area under curve (AUC) [95% CI] were 0.90 [0.87, 0.92], 0.92 [0.89, 0.94], and 0.93 [0.90, 0.95].

Conclusion: These results suggest that ASL quantitative biomarkers, particularly rCBF and CBF, have the potential to discriminate between glioma progression and therapy-induced changes.