Objective: To compare the accuracy of different methods of measuring the prostate volume (PV) based on the manifestations of prostatic ultrasonography and MRI.

Methods: Using the drainage method, we measured the volumes of 101 prostatic specimens collected from radical prostatectomy. And with the measures obtained as reference standards, we calculated the PV of the patients with the maximum width (W), height (H) and length (L) of the prostates obtained preoperatively by transabdominal ultrasonography (TAUS), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and MRI using the ellipsoidal formula (PV = W × H × L × 0.52), bullet formula (PV = W × H × L × 0.65) and 3D reconstruction technology. We evaluated the accuracy of the above methods using the Mann-Whitney U test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman scatterplot.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the specimen and preoperative PVs. The ICCs of the specimen PVs obtained by MRI 3D reconstruction, TRUS bullet formula, MRI ellipsoidal formula and TAUS ellipsoidal formula were 0.978, 0.862, 0.857 and 0.745, respectively. The Bland-Altman scatterplot exhibited that the preoperative PV calculated by MRI 3D reconstruction had the highest consistency with that of the specimen PV, followed by that measured by TRUS bullet formula and that obtained by MRI ellipsoidal formula, while that determined by TAUS ellipsoidal formula had a low consistency.

Conclusion: The MRI 3D reconstruction technology is the most reliable method for the measurement of PV, followed by TRUS bullet formula, but the latter is recommended for its high applicability in clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ellipsoidal formula
20
bullet formula
16
mri ellipsoidal
12
mri reconstruction
12
trus bullet
12
formula
9
prostatic ultrasonography
8
measuring prostate
8
accuracy methods
8
reconstruction technology
8

Similar Publications

Intraoperative assessment of tumor margins can be challenging; as neoplastic cells may extend beyond the margins seen on preoperative imaging. Real-time intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) has emerged as a valuable tool for delineating tumor boundaries during surgery. However, concerns remain regarding its ability to accurately distinguish between tumor margins, peritumoral edema, and normal brain tissue.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We developed a simple quantifiable scoring system that predicts aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) mortality, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), and modified Rankin scale (mRS) outcomes using readily available SAH admission data with SAH volume (SAHV) measured on computed tomography (CT). We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 277 patients with aSAH admitted at our Comprehensive Stroke Center at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, between January 5, 2012, and February 24, 2022. We developed a mathematical radiographic model SAHV that measures basal cisternal SAH blood volume using a derivation of the ABC/2 ellipsoid formula (A = width/thickness, B = length, C = vertical extension) on noncontrast CT, which we previously demonstrated is comparable to pixel-based manual segmentation on noncontrast CT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The adsorption of ellipsoidal colloidal particles on liquid interfaces induces interfacial deformation, resulting in anisotropic interface-mediated interactions and the formation of superstructures. Soft prolate-shaped microgels at the air-water interface offer an ideal model for studying spontaneous capillary-driven self-assembly due to their tunable aspect ratio, controlled functionality, and softness. These microgels consist of a polystyrene core surrounded by a cross-linked, fluorescently labeled poly([Formula: see text]-isopropylmethylacrylamide) shell.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The incidence of asymptomatic thyroid nodules has risen enormously, with > 90% being benign. Despite limited long-term data, significant nodule growth (SNG) is common. Guidelines recommend cytology reevaluation if SNG occurs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To determine whether the difference between MRI-based and ultrasound (US)-based volume measurements are associated with MRI/US-targeted fusion-guided biopsy outcomes.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective, single-center study involved 4177 consecutive patients biopsied between 2010 and 2023 using both MRI/US-targeted fusion and systematic biopsy. Biopsies were indicated because of elevated PSA levels or abnormal multiparametric MRI results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!