AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates the effectiveness and quality of systematic reviews on the use of compound Kushen injection (CKi) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
  • Researchers analyzed multiple databases for systematic reviews and assessed reporting quality, methodology, risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence using established guidelines.
  • Out of 12 systematic reviews included, only 42% had complete reporting, while all were found to have critically low methodological quality, and the evidence indicated a moderate benefit to patient outcomes like one-year survival rates and response rates.

Article Abstract

Ethnopharmacological Relevance: For the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), compound Kushen injection (CKi) is commonly used in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Aims Of The Study: Our objective was to evaluate the reporting quality, methodological quality, risk of bias, and certainty of evidence for CKi combined with TACE for the treatment of patients with HCC by conducting systematic reviews (SRs). The purpose of this study was to improve the clinical application of CKis, strengthen clinical decision-making regarding CKis, and inform future research.

Materials And Methods: We used eight databases to systematically search SRs of CKi combined with TACE for HCC through February 21, 2023. The quality of reporting of SRs was evaluated using the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, methodological quality using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2, risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in Systematic Review, and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment. Finally, the assessment results were visualized by the evidence mapping method. This overview has been registered on PROSPERO with the registration title "Compound Kushen injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: An overview of systematic reviews" and registration number CRD42022369120.

Results: A total of 12 SRs meeting the inclusion criteria were included. In terms of reporting quality, 42% of SRs reported relatively complete reports and 58% had certain deficiencies. The methodological quality of all SRs was " critically low". The risk of bias was evaluated as low in 33% of SRs and high in 67% of SRs. The results of the evidence synthesis showed that, in the "moderate" level of evidence, CKi combined with TACE resulted in a 12.7%-21.5% benefit for one-year survival rate, 11.7%-17.2% benefit for objective response rate (ORR), 20.5%-27.1% benefit for quality of life, 22.2% benefit for nausea and vomiting, and 24.7%-27.4% benefit for leukopenia in HCC patients.

Conclusion: In conclusion, CKi combined with TACE improved survival, ORR and quality of life in patients with HCC, and reduced adverse events. The results should be interpreted with caution due to the low methodological quality of the included SRs. The clinical efficacy of CKis must be confirmed in a large number of randomized controlled trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.117267DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic reviews
16
methodological quality
16
risk bias
16
cki combined
16
combined tace
16
kushen injection
12
hepatocellular carcinoma
12
quality
9
srs
9
compound kushen
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!