To automate or not to automate: advocating the 'cliff-edge' principle.

Ergonomics

Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Published: November 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The paper reviews 40 years of ergonomics and human factors research, noting that current automation issues still echo past discussions.* -
  • It introduces the 'cliff-edge' principle, which advocates for limiting automation capabilities until they can completely handle tasks, instead of implementing partial automation.* -
  • The authors promote a human-centered approach to technology use, arguing that tasks should be fully assigned to either humans or automation to avoid performance issues.*

Article Abstract

We reflect briefly on the last forty years or so of ergonomics and human factors research in automation, observing that many of the issues being discussed today are the same as all those decades ago. In this paper, we explicate one of the key arguments regarding the application of automation in complex safety-critical domains, which proposes restraining the capabilities of automation technology until it is able to fully and completely take over the task at hand. We call this the 'cliff-edge' principle of automation design. Instead, we espouse a use for the technology in a more problem-driven, human-centred way. These are not entirely new ideas and such a philosophy is already gaining traction in ergonomics and human factors. The point is that in a given system, tasks should be controlled either by human or by automation; anything in between only causes problems for system performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2023.2270786DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

'cliff-edge' principle
8
ergonomics human
8
human factors
8
automation
5
automate automate
4
automate advocating
4
advocating 'cliff-edge'
4
principle reflect
4
reflect forty
4
forty years
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The homeless population faces significant barriers in accessing dental care, leading to greater inequality compared to the general public, with limited recent evidence on effective service delivery models, following the Smile4Life report from 2009.
  • The study aims to co-design principles for a dental service specifically tailored to adults experiencing homelessness, utilizing qualitative methods and expert input from both users and healthcare practitioners.
  • Five key themes emerged from focus group discussions, highlighting the impact of oral health on the homeless, barriers to access, practitioner perceptions, and factors for a successful service, leading to five principles for a new dental care model: patient-centered services, a welcoming environment, trained staff, dental education, and peer mentoring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The paper reviews 40 years of ergonomics and human factors research, noting that current automation issues still echo past discussions.* -
  • It introduces the 'cliff-edge' principle, which advocates for limiting automation capabilities until they can completely handle tasks, instead of implementing partial automation.* -
  • The authors promote a human-centered approach to technology use, arguing that tasks should be fully assigned to either humans or automation to avoid performance issues.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The sociocultural framing of public attitudes to sharing the costs of social care for older people in England.

Health Soc Care Community

November 2022

Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit (PIRU), Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Article Synopsis
  • Twelve online focus groups with members of the public discussed their support for shared funding for social care for older adults, focusing on their views on cost distribution and underlying sociocultural beliefs.
  • Four main sociocultural frames emerged: 'scarcity' (financial burden), 'medicalised conception of care' (purpose of care), 'consumer' (private market roles), and 'loss and abandonment' (safety and belonging).
  • The 'scarcity' frame was the most influential, leading to concerns about affordability and the need for shared costs, yet participants expressed a desire for increased government funding compared to the current levels.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!