Background: The impact of serial imaging on the outcome of ICU patients has not been studied specifically in patients with high illness severity.

Methods: The authors sought a relationship between the numbers of antero-posterior supine chest X-rays (CXR), computed tomography (CT) examinations, and outcome in a cohort of 292 patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS collected over 24 months in a high-volume ECMO center with established ultrasound and echocardiographic diagnostics. Of the patients, 172 (59%) were obese or morbidly obese, and 119 (41%) were treated with ECMO.

Results: The median number of CXRs was eight per 14 days of the length of stay in the ICU. The CXR rate was not related to ICU survival ( = 0.37). Patients required CT scanning in 26.5% of cases, with no relationship to the outcome except for the better ICU survival of the ECMO patients without a need for a CT scan ( = 0.01). The odds ratio for survival associated with ordering a CT scan in an ECMO patient was 0.48, = 0.01. The calculated savings for not routinely requesting a whole-body CT scan in every patient were 98.685 EUR/24 months.

Conclusions: Serial imaging does not impact the survival rates of patients with severe ARDS. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients who did not need CT scanning had significantly better ICU outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573453PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196367DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

serial imaging
12
impact serial
8
extracorporeal membrane
8
membrane oxygenation
8
patients
8
patients severe
8
icu survival
8
better icu
8
icu
5
prognostic impact
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!