A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Outcome Analysis of Speed Gate Cannulation during Standard Infrarenal Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) typically involves a technique called contralateral gate cannulation (CGC), but tricky cases can lead to longer procedures and higher radiation exposure.
  • A study analyzed 371 patients, narrowing down to 172 who met criteria for comparing traditional CGC with a new method called speed gate cannulation (SGC).
  • Results indicated that SGC significantly reduced both CGC time and fluoroscopy time without major complications, suggesting it is an efficient option worth considering in standard EVAR procedures, particularly in emergencies.

Article Abstract

Background: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is generally performed with bi/trimodular stent-grafts requiring retrograde contralateral gate cannulation (CGC). In the case of tricky CGC, an increased EVAR procedural time and radiation exposure have been reported. Herein, we compare the outcomes of conventional CGC and CGC using the speed gate cannulation (SGC) technique in standard EVAR for a propensity-matched cohort.

Methods: A total of 371 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were fulfilled in 172 patients who underwent propensity score matching. Primary outcomes included operative time, CGC time, mean contrast medium, fluoroscopy time, and CGC fluoroscopy time.

Results: After matching, 78 patients were included in each group (SGC vs. standard). Primary outcomes registered a significant reduction in CGC time (4 [1-6] vs. 8 [6-14] min; = 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (12 [9-16] vs. 17 [12-25] min).

Conclusions: In this preliminary experiment, the use of SGC was feasible with no significant registered postoperative complications. A significant reduction in contrast medium usage, radiation exposure, and CGC time was observed with the use of SGC. SGC is a simple adjunctive technique, and its use should be considered in standard EVAR, especially in emergency scenarios, where time is of the essence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10573247PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196263DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gate cannulation
12
cgc time
12
speed gate
8
cgc
8
time
8
radiation exposure
8
standard evar
8
primary outcomes
8
time cgc
8
contrast medium
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!