A systematic review on removal of osseointegrated implants: un update.

BMC Oral Health

Unit of Prosthodontics, Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University "G. d'Annunzio" of Chieti- Pescara, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

Published: October 2023

Background: Today dental implants represent an effective therapy in case of partial or total edentulism, with an excellent success rate. Despite the results obtained, there may be biological or mechanical complications during the therapy, which lead to the loss of the implant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current state of the art in the literature on techniques used for the removal of dental implants. Various aspects will be analyzed, such as the success of the technique, any complications, and the advantages and disadvantages of their use.

Methods: Two reviewers conducted a literature analysis (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) of the last 20 years (2003-2023). The main criterion analyzed was the success of the technique, while secondary outcomes such as complications and risks of the technique were also analyzed. 258 articles were identified in the various search databases. 42 eligible articles were subsequently identified after an article screening. Only 18 full texts were subsequently included in the review.

Results: A total of 18 articles were selected and 1142 implants and 595 patients were included. The main techniques used were the Counter-Torque Ratchet Technique (CTRT), Piezoelectric bone surgery (PBS), trephine drills, carbide burs, Erbium, Chromium, Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, Garnett (Er:Cr:YSGG) laser and carbon dioxide (CO) laser. Combined uses of techniques have been identified such as: PBS and trephine burs or carbide burs, trephine burs with the use of a 3d-printed guide, CTRT and trephine burs. The technique with the highest success rate, less morbidity for the patient, and less removal of bone appears to be the CTRT.

Conclusions: The use of conservative techniques, especially CTRT, in bone removal is useful to allow for immediate implant placement in the removal area. However, further studies with a high sample size are needed to be performed on all techniques, particularly new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that allow for the analysis of the success of alternative techniques such as Laser and Piezosurgery, which appear to be very promising.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576342PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03438-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

trephine burs
12
systematic review
8
dental implants
8
success rate
8
analyzed success
8
success technique
8
pbs trephine
8
carbide burs
8
techniques
6
removal
5

Similar Publications

Assessment of operator performance during dynamically guided osteotomy and root-end resection in endodontic microsurgery: A cross-sectional in vitro study.

J Dent

November 2024

Faculty of Dentistry, DDS, Mdent, Graduate Endodontics Program, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia; Faculty of Dentistry, DDS, Mdent, Graduate Oral and Maxillofacial Program, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to evaluate how the experience level of two operators affects their performance and accuracy when using computer-assisted dynamic navigation (C-ADN) systems during dental procedures involving thick bone layers, specifically in osteotomy and root-end resections.
  • - Results indicated that the less experienced operator exhibited significantly worse performance in terms of task-focused metrics, including longer visuomotor coordination times and higher rates of procedural errors compared to the experienced operator, who showed better overall outcomes.
  • - Both operators felt that C-ADN systems improved their surgical skills and patient safety, but only the less experienced operator reported challenges related to mental workload and usability, highlighting a gap in proficiency and comfort with the technology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To provide an overview of an innovative surgical approach to guided bone regeneration, the Pack Into Bone (PIB) technique.

Methods: Twenty subjects, eight men and 12 women, aged 34 to 68 (mean 51.5) were selected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Several approaches have been suggested for implant removal. However, further research is necessary to review data regarding the amount of bone removed and the duration of removal time for different procedures. This study evaluates and compares various implant removal techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim was to evaluate primary implant stability and bone microarchitecture in two drilling situations, by comparing the conventional technique (CT) and osseodensification (OD) (Versah Burs - Jackson - Mississippi - USA). The implant insertion torque (IT), implant stability quotient (ISQ), and the peri-implant trabecular microstructure were assessed on bone fragments obtained from pig's tibia (n=12), divided between CT (n=6) and OD (n=6). After the drilling procedure, the implants were installed (3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Navigating Separated Instrument Retrieval: A Case Report.

Cureus

December 2023

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.

Instrument separation during endodontic therapy is a complication occurring in 2% to 6% of cases. Focusing on the Masserann technique, the study presents a success rate of 55% in retrieving separated instruments. The technique's effectiveness is demonstrated through a case involving retrieving an instrument from the mandibular first premolar.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!