AI Article Synopsis

  • Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (IO) shows promise for treating patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC), leading to significant pathological response rates.
  • A study analyzed 38 patients who underwent IO, finding that 45% had complete endoscopic responses and 23% had complete radiographic responses, with greater responses observed after more than four cycles of treatment.
  • Discrepancies were common between imaging and endoscopy results, even when patients achieved pathological complete remission, highlighting the need for better clinical response evaluation methods.

Article Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (IO) is emerging as a therapeutic option for patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) given high pathological response rates. The aim of the study was to characterise imaging and endoscopic response to IO.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with localised dMMR CRC that received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy was conducted. Endoscopy, imaging, and pathological outcomes were reviewed to determine response to treatment according to standardised criteria.

Results: Thirty-eight patients had received IO for the treatment of localised CRC (median eight cycles). Among evaluable cases (n = 31 for endoscopy and n = 34 for imaging), the best endoscopic response was complete response (CR) in 45% of cases, and the best radiographic response was CR in 23% of cases. Imaging CR rate after ≤4 cycles of IO (n = 1) was 6% compared to 44% after >4 IO cycles (n = 7). Among 28 patients with imaging and endoscopy available, a discrepancy in best response was noted in 15 (54%) cases. At a median follow-up of 28.2 months from IO start, 18 patients underwent surgical resection of which 11 (61%) had pathological CR (pCR). Despite pCR or no evidence of progression ≥6 months after completion of IO among non-operatively managed patients, 72% and 42% of patients had non-CR on imaging and endoscopy, respectively.

Conclusions: Discrepancies between imaging and endoscopy are prevalent, and irregularities identified on these modalities can be identified despite pathological remission. Improved clinical response criteria are warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113356DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

imaging endoscopy
12
localised dmmr
8
dmmr colorectal
8
colorectal cancer
8
response
8
endoscopic response
8
endoscopy imaging
8
patients
7
imaging
7
endoscopy
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!