AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to examine the prescribing patterns of analgesics for patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) over time, despite limited evidence supporting their effectiveness.
  • Analgesic prescriptions remained common from 2004 to 2020, with a notable decline in overall prescription rates, while opioids became the most prescribed analgesics by 2020, and gabapentinoid use significantly increased.
  • The research highlighted that analgesic prescribing varied based on factors like age, sex, and socio-economic status, indicating a misalignment with evidence-based guidelines in treating IA.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Despite little evidence that analgesics are effective in inflammatory arthritis (IA), studies report substantial opioid prescribing. The extent this applies to other analgesics is uncertain. We undertook a comprehensive evaluation of analgesic prescribing in patients with IA in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum to evaluate this.

Methods: From 2004 to 2020, cross-sectional analyses evaluated analgesic prescription annual prevalence in RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), stratified by age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation and geography. Joinpoint regression evaluated temporal prescribing trends. Cohort studies determined prognostic factors at diagnosis for chronic analgesic prescriptions using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Analgesic prescribing declined over time but remained common: 2004 and 2020 IA prescription prevalence was 84.2/100 person-years (PY) (95% CI 83.9, 84.5) and 64.5/100 PY (64.2, 64.8), respectively. In 2004, NSAIDs were most prescribed (56.1/100 PY; 55.8, 56.5), falling over time. Opioids were most prescribed in 2020 (39.0/100 PY; 38.7, 39.2). Gabapentinoid prescribing increased: 2004 prevalence 1.1/100 PY (1.0, 1.2); 2020 prevalence 9.9/100 PY (9.7, 10.0). Most opioid prescriptions were chronic (2020 prevalence 23.4/100 PY [23.2, 23.6]). Non-NSAID analgesic prescribing was commoner in RA, older people, females and deprived areas/northern England. Conversely, NSAID prescribing was commoner in axSpA/males, varying little by deprivation/geography. Peri-diagnosis was high-risk for starting chronic opioid/NSAID prescriptions. Prognostic factors for chronic opioid/gabapentinoid and NSAID prescriptions differed, with NSAIDs having no consistently significant association with deprivation (unlike opioids/gabapentinoids).

Conclusion: IA analgesic prescribing of all classes is widespread. This is neither evidence-based nor in line with guidelines. Peri-diagnosis is an opportune moment to reduce chronic analgesic prescribing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147543PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead463DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

analgesic prescribing
24
prescribing
9
analgesic
8
prescribing patients
8
inflammatory arthritis
8
clinical practice
8
practice datalink
8
2004 2020
8
prognostic factors
8
chronic analgesic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!