Since the crossed control of sensitive-motor body functions by the contralateral cerebral hemispheres was recognized in the early 18th century, clinicians have been baffled by patients developing a motor deficit involving the extremities on the same side as an intracranial lesion. In the first third of the 20th century, three main hypotheses were proposed to explain this so-called ipsilateral or paradoxical hemiparesis: (1) the absence of decussation of the corticospinal tracts; (2) diaschisis, or blocking of the normal input to a brain region anatomically distant from the injured site; and (3) compression of the contralateral cerebral peduncle against the tentorial border, also known as the Kernohan-Woltman notch phenomenon. Here, we deal with the less widely known contributions of the Belgian neurosurgeon Léon Ectors, who included this paradoxical deficit within a neurological syndrome he considered highly specific for an early diagnosis of those meningiomas growing over the third frontal convolution. The present manuscript includes a systematic review of the cases of ipsilateral hemiparesis secondary to intracranial masses reported in ancient and modern scientific medical literature. We also address in-depth the physiopathological theories accounting for this syndrome and contrast them with Léon Ectors' observations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13760-023-02394-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

third frontal
8
frontal convolution
8
ipsilateral hemiparesis
8
contralateral cerebral
8
syndrome third
4
convolution léon
4
léon ectors´
4
ectors´ legacy
4
legacy paradoxical
4
paradoxical ipsilateral
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!