A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Does non-cavity distorting intramural fibroid affect endometrium around the time of embryo implantation? | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • * Researchers collected paired endometrial samples—one from under the fibroid and one from the opposite side—and compared their histological dating and expressions of Mucin1, Glycodelin, and uterine natural killer cell density.
  • * Findings revealed that Mucin1 staining was significantly higher in the region beneath the fibroid, but no substantial differences were observed in other markers or between the paired samples, leaving the impact of altered Mucin1 expression on implantation unclear.

Article Abstract

The effect of the intramural fibroids not distorting the cavity remains controversial on implantation and pregnancy. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of non-cavity distorting intramural fibroids on endometrium. Fifty-six women with non-cavity distorting intramural fibroid were recruited in this study. Paired endometrial specimens, one from beneath the fibroid (ipsilateral endometrium) and the other from the opposite side of uterine cavity, away from the fibroid (contralateral endometrium) were obtained 7-9 days after the luteinizing hormone surge in a natural cycle. Histological dating, Mucin1 and Glycodelin expression and uterine natural killer (uNK) cell density were compared between the paired samples. The median (IQR) -score of Mucin1 staining in the ipsilateral luminal epithelium was 210% (142-230%), which was significantly ( < 0.05) higher than that of the contralateral luminal endometrium (157%, IQR 114-176%). There was no significant difference in Mucin1 expression in the glandular epithelium. There was no significant difference in Glycodelin expression in luminal and glandular epithelium, uNK cells density or histological dating results between the paired endometrial samples. In conclusion, it is uncertain whether the altered expression of Mucin1 in luminal epithelium alone may have impact on implantation when other markers are not changed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2023.2264498DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-cavity distorting
12
distorting intramural
12
intramural fibroid
8
intramural fibroids
8
intramural
4
fibroid
4
fibroid affect
4
endometrium
4
affect endometrium
4
endometrium time
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!