Better clinical outcomes and faster weight bearing after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy using allogeneic than synthetic graft: A secondary analysis of a Francophone Arthroscopy Society Symposium.

Introduction: Although an autogenous graft has the highest rate of bone union to fill the void created in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO), it also has some disadvantages, such as prolonged surgical time, donor site pain and morbidity. Two possible candidates for ideal grafts to replace autogenous grafts are allogeneic and synthetic graft, which are free from donor site pain and morbidity. However, previous reports comparing the clinical results of allogeneic to synthetic graft have been limited and controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare radiological findings and clinical outcomes of using synthetic versus allogenic graft to fill the void created in MOWHTO.

Hypothesis: The present clinical study hypothesized that allogenic graft to fill the void would allow the higher rate of bone union and better clinical outcomes.

Material And Methods: This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of 95 patients who received MOWHTO to fill the void with either synthetic or allogenic graft (44 in Syn group, 51 in Allo group). Preoperatively and postoperatively, all patients were clinically evaluated; Return to work, Tegner activity score, and the Western Ontario and Macmaster University scores were reported. Radiographically, osteoarthritis grade and pre- and postoperative parameters were reported, including Hip-knee-ankle angle, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, joint line convergence angle, proximal posterior tibial angle, and limb length discrepancy. Perioperative details and complications were also reported.

Results: Mean follow-up (months) were 24.0±1.3 in Syn group and 26.8±1.2 in Allo group (p=0.13). The postoperative improvement of pain and global WOMAC scores in Allo group were significantly better than in Syn group (ΔPain of WOMAC: Syn group 27.8±4.4, Allo group 49.3±3.8, p value <0.001*) (ΔGlobal score of WOMAC: Syn group 16.7±3.2, Allo group 37.4±4.9, p value=0.002*). The risk of hinge fracture in Syn group was significantly higher than in Allo group (Hinge fracture by Takeuchi grade (0/1/2/3): Syn group 37/3/3/1, Allo group 43/8/0/0, p value=0.04*). The timing of full weight bearing in Allo group was significantly earlier than in Syn group (Weight Bearing (1=FWB, 2=PWB 3wk, 3=PWB 6wk): Syn group 2.7±0.1, Allo group 2.3±0.1, p value=0.01*).

Discussion: The use of allogenic graft to fill the void in MOWHTO does not show superiority in bone union compared to synthetic graft, however it improves pain, function, decreases the risk of hinge fracture and allows faster weight bearing than synthetic graft.

Level Of Proof: III; Case-control study.