AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was conducted on frontline healthcare workers in Kuala Lumpur during the COVID-19 pandemic to assess the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress, along with their relationship to sociodemographic factors, workplace concerns, and coping strategies.
  • Results showed that 69.3% of participants experienced depression, 77.4% anxiety, and 57.7% stress; none of the sociodemographic factors were linked to these mental health issues.
  • Depressive symptoms were tied to several workplace worries and specific coping strategies, with humor and substance use linked positively to depression, whereas active coping and acceptance were negatively correlated; similar patterns were noted for stress, but anxiety showed no correlation with

Article Abstract

Introduction: This study was aimed to measure the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress as well as to evaluate the associations of these mental disorders with sociodemographic factors, workplace worries, and coping strategies among frontline HCWs in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Sociodemographic data questionnaire, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale 21, sources of workplace worries questionnaire, and Brief-COPE inventory were randomly distributed to frontline HCWs who worked at the medical, emergency, and anaesthesiology departments. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests and multivariable linear regression analysis.

Results: A total of 137 frontline HCWs responded to the questionnaires. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress was 69.3%, 77.4%, and 57.7%, respectively. None of the sociodemographic characteristics was associated with depression, anxiety, and stress. Depression was associated to all sources of workplace worries, except "fear of getting infected" (p = 0.089), while anxiety and stress were associated with all sources of workplace worries. Humour (β = 0.821), self-blame (β = 0.686), denial (β = 0.676), substance use (β = 0.835), and behavioural disengagement (β = 0.583) were positively correlated to depression. However, active coping (β = -0.648) and acceptance (β = -0.602) were negatively correlated to depression. On the other hand, active coping (β = 0.913), planning (β = 0.879), acceptance (β = 0.831), religion (β = 0.704), and self-distraction (β = 0.929) were positively correlated to stress. Only substance use (β = -0.417) was negatively correlated to stress. All coping strategies did not correlate to anxiety.

Conclusion: The high prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress is attributed by the various sources of workplace worries and the inappropriate coping strategies among the frontline HCWs. Measures that minimise workplace worries and inappropriate coping strategies must be implemented promptly.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560014PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20258DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

workplace worries
28
anxiety stress
24
sources workplace
20
coping strategies
20
depression anxiety
20
frontline hcws
16
prevalence depression
12
worries coping
8
depression
8
stress
8

Similar Publications

Concerns of Novice Nurses in the First Year of Work: A Qualitative Content Analysis.

SAGE Open Nurs

December 2024

Department of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.

Introduction: Novice nurses face many concerns at the beginning of their professional careers. The majority of novice nurses have been challenged with stress, inability to work autonomously, insecurity, inexperience, and unpreparedness to work in a clinical setting at the early of their work.

Objective: This study aims to explain novice nurses' experiences to understand their concerns.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: People living with HIV/AIDS today expect a typical lifespan, although many continue to encounter psychological and societal challenges, including stigma and discrimination. In healthcare settings, this may manifest as refusal of care or treatment, non-consensual testing, confidentiality breaches, and unfavourable attitudes, among other issues. We sought to better understand stigma-related beliefs and practices within the Romanian clinician community.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Workplace violence significantly affects diagnostic radiographers in Ghana, leading to issues like anxiety and burnout, with a staggering 93.8% reporting experiences of such violence in the past year.
  • The study gathered data from 209 respondents through an anonymous online survey that explored various forms of violence, revealing verbal abuse as the most common.
  • Key factors related to experiencing workplace violence included the level of education and personal concerns about safety, highlighting the need for further qualitative research to understand the reporting issues better.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Violence against healthcare professionals: perspective of local focal points in the south of Portugal.

BMC Health Serv Res

November 2024

CHRC - Comprehensive Health Research Centre, University of Évora, NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, 1150-082, Portugal.

Background: Violence against health professionals is a growing problem that affects the quality of care provided and the well-being of workers. In the Alentejo region (Southern Portugal), the Regional Health Administration has been developing strategies to prevent and combat this phenomenon, namely, through the implementation of the Action Plan for the Prevention of Violence in the Health Sector. Violence in the health sector includes all situations in which a worker in the Ministry of Health's health institutions is exposed to any type of violence related to their work, putting their safety, well-being or health at risk, or that of others.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study aimed to explore the reasons adults in the general population, influenza risk groups (RGs) and health care workers (HCWs) in Norway give for their vaccination choices and whether these reasons vary between groups or over time in order to further improve influenza vaccination coverage.

Methods: Respondents of a nationally representative telephone survey conducted by Statistics Norway were asked "What was the most important reason why you did/did not get vaccinated?". The question on influenza non-vaccination was included in 2016 and in 2020 to 2023 and the question on influenza vaccination in 2021 to 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!