Genes and environment: An old pair in a new era.

What is the relationship between our genes and the environment we live in with regard to health? Like the debate about nature or nurture in the determination of our personality and behavior, the issue of genes and environment has been discussed intensely in the last two centuries. Is it Darwin or Lamarck who is right about the basic determinants of our health, especially as we age in a rapidly changing environment? Evolutionary biology as proposed by Darwin with natural selection at its core may not be able to explain almost instant adjustments of phenotypic traits to the pressures of the environment. Epigenesis, a concept that dates from Aristotle, provides a mechanism for the environment to affect variation in genetic traits that may become heritable. Indeed, Lamarck first described the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Thus, it appears that in contemporary genetics, both Darwin and Lamarck are right: environmental pressures may affect our genes through epigenetics, in ways that allow for inheritance of the changes, a Lamarckian concept; however, evolution through natural selection is the basis for incorporation (or rejection) of new traits and their sustained inheritance, a Darwinian concept. In this review, we present the synthesis of Darwin's and Lamarck's theories, the only way to understand how our health, and that of our progeny, responds to challenging and fast-changing environmental cues. In addition, we present other examples of environment-driven changes in disease frequency or expression.