AI Article Synopsis

  • Observational studies indicate smoking may raise the risk for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) but lower the risks for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and melanoma.
  • This research used Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal relationship between smoking and skin cancer risks, minimizing the influence of other confounding factors.
  • Results showed that while a genetic predisposition to smoking was linked to lower risks for all skin cancer types, smoking intensity was specifically associated with a reduced risk of melanoma, reinforcing observational findings that smoking may not elevate cSCC risk.

Article Abstract

Observational studies have suggested that smoking may increase the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) while decreasing the risks of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and melanoma. However, it remains possible that confounding by other factors may explain these associations. The aim of this investigation was to use Mendelian randomization (MR) to test whether smoking is associated with skin cancer, independently of other factors. Two-sample MR analyses were conducted to determine the causal effect of smoking measures on skin cancer risk using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics. We used the inverse-variance-weighted estimator to derive separate risk estimates across genetic instruments for all smoking measures. A genetic predisposition to smoking initiation was associated with lower risks of all skin cancer types, although none of the effect estimates reached statistical significance (OR 95% CI BCC 0.91, 0.82-1.01; cSCC 0.82, 0.66-1.01; melanoma 0.91, 0.82-1.01). Results for other measures were similar to smoking initiation with the exception of smoking intensity which was associated with a significantly reduced risk of melanoma (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.89). Our findings support the findings of observational studies linking smoking to lower risks of melanoma and BCC. However, we found no evidence that smoking is associated with an elevated risk of cSCC; indeed, our results are most consistent with a decreased risk, similar to BCC and melanoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10558453PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44144-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin cancer
16
smoking
10
observational studies
8
cell carcinoma
8
bcc melanoma
8
smoking associated
8
smoking measures
8
smoking initiation
8
lower risks
8
091 082-101
8

Similar Publications

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have advanced the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, some patients develop ICI-associated toxicities like hepatitis (ie, immune-mediated hepatitis; IMH). Although these toxicities usually resolve with steroids, steroid-refractory events may occur, which may be a major source of morbidity and mortality without obviously defined treatment algorithms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Melanoma is an aggressive type of skin cancer that arises from melanocytes, the cells responsible for producing skin pigment. In contrast to non-melanoma skin cancers like basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma is more invasive. Melanoma was distinguished by its rapid progression, high metastatic potential, and significant resistance to conventional therapies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Guardians of the Game: UV-Specific Skin Cancer Prevention by Coaches in Outdoor Sports.

Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed

January 2025

Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health, CPD, Division of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Background: Due to the global rise in UV radiation, the prevalence of skin cancer is increasing significantly, with outdoor athletes being identified as a particularly vulnerable population group.

Methods: This nationwide, cross-sectional study was conducted among adult coaches from the 10 largest outdoor sports associations in Germany. Their applied prevention measures and the potential for further improvement in prevention were evaluated by guideline based scores (range [0-100]).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!