A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Insights into enlarged prostatic utricles and Müllerian duct system remnants associated with posterior hypospadias. | LitMetric

Introduction: The prostatic utricle (PU) consists of the caudal remnant of the Müllerian duct and the urogenital sinus. The term "vagina masculina" is used if other Müllerian structures are associated with the PU. This work aims to investigate the incidence, management, and follow up of enlarged PUs and Müllerian remnants in males with posterior hypospadias.

Patients And Methods: This study presents a retrospective review of cases presented with posterior hypospadias over a 5-year period. Prior to hypospadias repair, retrograde urethrograms were used to investigate enlarged PU. Subsequently, they were classified according to the Ikoma score and further assessed by karyotyping and cystoscope. Surgical excision was indicated in cases with symptomatic utricles or vagina masculina.

Results: Thirty patients were included in the study in the period between 2015 and 2020 (Table). All cases were asymptomatic initially. Twelve patients were diagnosed with enlarged PU; three of them had vagina masculina. One case with perineal hypospadias had a separate perineal opening for PU. Following hypospadias repair, three of the eight cases treated conservatively turned symptomatic.

Discussion: The incidence of enlarged PU and Müllerian remnants varied among different studies. However, it increased as the severity of hypospadias increased. Preoperative urethrogram was helpful in the diagnosis and classification of PU, but it had its limitations. Cystoscope was more advantageous in diagnosing vagina masculina. Although most cases were asymptomatic, some turned symptomatic after hypospadias repair. Some cases with perineal hypospadias had PU with a separate perineal opening.

Conclusion: The incidence of enlarged PUs or Müllerian remnants was 40%. Although cases were asymptomatic before hypospadias surgery, some cases turned into symptomatic after hypospadias repair. In some cases, the PU or Müllerian remnants had a separate perineal opening. They can be classified as a particular form of Ikoma grade III necessitating surgical intervention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.09.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

müllerian remnants
16
hypospadias repair
16
cases asymptomatic
12
separate perineal
12
hypospadias
10
cases
9
müllerian duct
8
posterior hypospadias
8
enlarged pus
8
pus müllerian
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!