Anterior Transarticular Crossing Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Joint Instability: A Biomechanical Study.

Neurospine

Division of Spinal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Published: September 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the biomechanical stability of two types of screw fixations—anterior transarticular crossing screw (ATCS) and anterior transarticular screw (ATS)—in treating odontoid fractures.
  • Eight human cadaver specimens were tested under five conditions to evaluate range of motion (ROM) and neutral zones (NZ) in response to applied loads.
  • Results showed that both ATS and ATCS significantly reduced motion compared to injury states, with bilateral ATCS providing the greatest stability in flexion-extension, suggesting ATCS could be a valuable option for atlantoaxial instability treatment.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the biomechanical stability of anterior transarticular crossing screw (ATCS) and compare it with anterior transarticular screw (ATS) which may provide basic evidence for clinical application.

Methods: Eight human fresh cadaveric specimens (occiput-C4) were tested with 5 conditions including the intact status, the injury status (type II odontoid fracture), the injury+ATS fixation status (traditional bilateral ATS fixation); the injury+unilateral ATCS fixation status; and the injury+bilateral ATCS fixation status. Specimens were applied to a pure moment of 1.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. The range of motions (ROMs) and the neutral zones (NZs) of C1 to C2 segment were calculated and compared between 5 status.

Results: ATS and ATCS fixations significantly reduced the motions in all directions when compared with the intact and injury statues (p < 0.05). In flexion-extension, the ROMs of ATS, unilateral ATCS, and bilateral ATCS were 4.7° ± 2.5°, 4.1° ± 1.9°, and 3.2° ± 1.2°, respectively. Bilateral ATCS resulted in a significant decrease in ROM in flexion-extension when compared with ATS and unilateral ATCS (p = 0.035 and p = 0.023). In lateral bending and axial rotation, there was no significant difference in ROM between the 3 fixations (p > 0.05). Three fixations resulted in similar NZs in all directions (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: ATCS is a biomechanically effective alternative or supplemental method for atlantoaxial instability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10562216PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346472.236DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anterior transarticular
12
fixation status
12
atcs
9
transarticular crossing
8
crossing screw
8
atcs fixation
8
lateral bending
8
bending axial
8
axial rotation
8
ats unilateral
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!