Global health reciprocal innovations originate in low-income and middle-income countries as well as high-income countries before their developers communicate about them with potential adopters in other countries as a transnational team. While communication technology has enabled a more rapid and broader sharing of information about innovations to prevent disease and improve health, innovations of various types have spread among countries, at all levels of income, for many centuries. In this article, we introduce the idea of reciprocal coproduction as a basis for the international sharing of information about innovations that exhibit potential for improving global health. Reciprocal coproduction occurs through two relational team-based processes: developer-led reinvention of an innovation so that it retains its desirable causal effects and implementer-led adaptation of that innovation so that it is compatible with new contexts into which it is introduced. Drawing on research and our own experiences across a range of health issues, we discuss common barriers to reciprocal coproduction and the diffusion of reciprocal innovations. We conclude with lessons drawn from dissemination and implementation science about the effective translation of reciprocal innovations from country to country so that researchers, policy-makers and social entrepreneurs can best ensure equity, accelerate adoptions and heighten the likelihood that global health reciprocal innovations will make a positive difference in health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10551926PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013134DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reciprocal coproduction
16
global health
16
reciprocal innovations
16
health reciprocal
12
reciprocal
8
coproduction basis
8
innovations
8
health innovations
8
sharing innovations
8
health
7

Similar Publications

Effectively addressing ethical issues in precision medicine research in Africa requires a holistic social contract that integrates biomedical knowledge with local cultural values and Indigenous knowledge systems. Drawing on African epistemologies such as ubuntu and ujamaa and on our collective experiences in genomics and big data research for sickle cell disease, hearing impairment, and fragile X syndrome and the project Public Understanding of Big Data in Genomics Medicine in Africa, we envision a transformative shift in health research data governance in Africa that could help create a sense of shared responsibility between all stakeholders in genomics and data-driven health research in Africa. This shift includes proposing a social contract for genomics and data science in health research that is grounded in African communitarianism such as solidarity, shared decision-making, and reciprocity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An in-depth understanding of stakeholders' experiences about their participation in the co-production of 'Maze Out': a serious game for the treatment of eating disorders.

J Eat Disord

November 2024

Psychiatric Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Psychiatric Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 18, Odense, Region South Denmark, 5000, Denmark.

Background: Co-production is increasingly used in mental health research and clinical settings. Maze Out is a digital game co-produced by clinicians, patients with eating disorders (EDs), an art director with lived experience in EDs, and a game-developing company. Maze Out is based on everyday challenges when suffering from EDs and is currently being evaluated as a supplement tool in EDs treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mechanisms for co-designing and co-producing health and social care: a realist synthesis.

Res Involv Engagem

October 2024

Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.

Article Synopsis
  • * A scoping review gathered 93 peer-reviewed articles focusing on dialogue and mutual understanding in engagement processes.
  • * The findings highlight six key mechanisms (intention, assets, dialogue, documentation, interpretation, and understanding) that are essential for effective participation, suggesting a need for clarity in using co-design and co-production terminology to convey complex processes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The interface between science and policy is a complex space, in theory and practice, that sees the interaction of various actors and perspectives coming together to enable policy-relevant evidence to support decision-making. Early Career Researchers (ECRs) are increasingly interested in working at the science-policy interface to support evidence-informed policy, with the number of opportunities to do so increasing at national and international levels. However, there are still many challenges limiting ECRs participation, not least how such a complex space can be accessed and navigated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Inclusion in public health research of young people from low-income households and those from minority ethnic groups remains low. It is recognised that there is a need to change the way in which research is conducted so that it becomes more inclusive. The aim of this work was to identify novel and innovative ways to maximise recruitment and inclusion of diverse participants when doing co-production within very short time frames for emergency responses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!