AI Article Synopsis

  • Malaria is a significant global health issue, particularly in Angola, which is one of the countries heavily affected, leading to high rates of cases and deaths; traditional diagnostic methods, like microscopy and rapid tests, often fall short.
  • The study evaluated the effectiveness of a new diagnostic method called loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) in detecting malaria from blood samples collected in Cubal, Angola, comparing it to existing methods.
  • Results showed that LAMP was more effective, identifying more positive cases than microscopy and RDTs, achieving an overall accuracy of 84.5% when samples were retested in a Spanish laboratory.

Article Abstract

Background: Malaria is a globally distributed infectious disease. According to the World Health Organization, Angola is one of the six countries that account for over half the global malaria burden in terms of both malaria cases and deaths. Diagnosis of malaria still depends on microscopic examination of thin and thick blood smears and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), which often lack analytical and clinical sensitivity. Molecular methods could overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study was to evaluate, for the first time to our knowledge, the performance of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for the diagnosis of malaria in an endemic area in Cubal, Angola, and to assess the reproducibility at a reference laboratory.

Methods: A total of 200 blood samples from patients attended at Hospital Nossa Senhora da Paz, Cubal, Angola, were analysed for Plasmodium spp. detection by microscopy, RDTs, and LAMP. LAMP assay was easily performed in a portable heating block, and the results were visualized by a simple colour change. Subsequently, the samples were sent to a reference laboratory in Spain to be reanalysed by the same colorimetric LAMP assay and also in real-time LAMP format.

Results: In field tests, a total of 67/200 (33.5%) blood samples were microscopy-positive for Plasmodium spp., 98/200 RDT positive, and 112/200 (56%) LAMP positive. Using microscopy as reference standard, field LAMP detected more microscopy-positive samples than RDTs (66/67; 98% vs. 62/67; 92.5%). When samples were reanalysed at a reference laboratory in Spain using both colorimetric and real-time assays, the overall reproducibility achieved 84.5%.

Conclusions: This is the first study to our knowledge in which LAMP has been clinically evaluated on blood samples in a resource-poor malaria-endemic area. The colorimetric LAMP proved to be more sensitive than microscopy and RDTs for malaria diagnosis in field conditions. Furthermore, LAMP showed an acceptable level of reproducibility in a reference laboratory. The possibility to use LAMP in a real-time format in a portable device reinforces the reliability of the assay for molecular diagnosis of malaria in resource-poor laboratories in endemic areas.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10548721PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05942-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lamp
12
lamp assay
12
cubal angola
12
diagnosis malaria
12
blood samples
12
reference laboratory
12
malaria
8
malaria diagnosis
8
reproducibility reference
8
plasmodium spp
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!