AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to create and evaluate a framework for measuring the resources, policies, and practices of mammogram facilities in the Appalachian region, focusing on seven key dimensions of imaging quality.
  • Researchers surveyed 192 out of 377 imaging sites in Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia, using statistical methods to analyze data on facility resources, community demographics, and mammogram screening rates.
  • Findings indicate that mammogram facilities in wealthier areas are typically better funded and part of larger health systems, while those in economically distressed regions rely more on outreach efforts to improve screening uptake.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Develop and test a measurement framework of mammogram facility resources, policies, and practices in Appalachia.

Methods: Survey items describing 7 domains of imaging facility qualities were developed and tested in the Appalachian regions of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. Medicare claims data (2016-2018) were obtained on catchment area mammogram services. Construct validity was examined from associations with facility affiliation, community characteristics, mammogram screening uptake, and market reach. Analyses were performed with t-tests and ANOVA.

Results: A total of 192 (of 377) sites completed the survey. Five factors were initially selected in exploratory factor analysis (FA) and refined in confirmatory FA: capacity, outreach & marketing, operational support, radiology review (NNFI = .94, GFI = 0.93), and diagnostic services (NNFI = 1.00, GFI = 0.99). Imaging capacity and diagnostic services were associated with screening uptake, with capacity strongly associated with catchment area demographic and economic characteristics. Imaging facilities in economically affluent versus poorer areas belong to larger health systems and have significantly more resources (P < .001). Facilities in economically distressed locations in Appalachia rely more heavily on outreach activities (P < .001). Higher facility capacity was significantly associated (P < .05) with larger catchment area size (median split: 48.5 vs 51.6), mammogram market share (47.4 vs 52.7), and screening uptake (47.6 vs 52.4).

Conclusions: A set of 18 items assessing breast imaging services and facility characteristics was obtained, representing policies and practices related to a facility's catchment area size, market share, and mammogram screening uptake.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12798DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

catchment area
16
screening uptake
16
policies practices
8
mammogram screening
8
diagnostic services
8
capacity associated
8
facilities economically
8
area size
8
market share
8
facility
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!