Purpose: To compare the efficacy of oral propranolol, oral rifampicin, and intravitreal anti-VEGF therapies on resolution-time and visual outcome in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

Methods: A total of 30 patients with CSCR were randomized into three groups of 10 patients. Group A was given oral propranolol, Group B was given oral rifampicin 4 weeks each, and Group C was given 0.05 ml intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF. Comparisons of mean BCVA, contrast sensitivity, and central macular thickness (CMT) performed between baseline and follow-up at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.

Results: Statistically significant improvement in BCVA and contrast sensitivity was noted among all three groups. Complete resolution of SRF as indicated by CMT was seen at the end of 4 weeks in Group C, whereas there was a steady decline in CMT until 3 months in Groups A and B.

Conclusion: Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy shows a significantly faster SRF resolution. However, oral propranolol and oral rifampicin could prove as a useful, cost-effective treatment of CSCR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683675PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_169_23DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral propranolol
16
oral rifampicin
16
propranolol oral
12
intravitreal anti-vegf
12
rifampicin intravitreal
8
central serous
8
serous chorioretinopathy
8
three groups
8
group oral
8
weeks group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!